what is this question again? please try to reword it
Answer:
A cashless society might sound like something out of science fiction, but we're already on that way. Several powerful nations are behind in Cash-free world, including Gov. and large financial services companies.Even the big institutions and financial system issued currencies in favor doing away with cash.
So,US can make a way for cash-less but not fully.
From~Charminglex : )
In the first sentence the subject is "urban sprawl" and the rest of the sentence is the predicate. In the second sentence, the subject is "Growing families" and the rest of the sentence is the predicate.
The subject of a sentence is the term that suffers or provokes the action of the verb of the sentence, while the predicate is all the terms that deny or affirm something about the subject.
In this case, it is important that you know which term is the verb of each sentence, as this term is essential for the subject to be found.
The verb is the term that indicates an action, or a state of the individual. In the two sentences presented above, the verbs are "to harm" and "to want."
Knowing which term is the verb of the sentence, you can find the subject and predicate as follows:
- To find the subject, ask who is causing or suffering the action of seeing.
- In the first sentence: Who is harming the habitat? Who is harming the habitat is urban expansion. In this case, urban expansion is the subject of the sentence.
- In the second sentence: Who wants bigger houses and yards? Growing families. Hence, growing families are the subject of the sentence.
- To find the predicate, identify what is being said about the subject of each sentence.
- In the first sentence: What is urban expansion doing? It's harming the habitat.
- In the second sentence: what do growing families want? They want bigger houses and yards.
You can find more information at the link below:
brainly.com/question/3733575?referrer=searchResults
Character is what you are in the dark." Dwight Lyman Moody, in this very witty quotation of his, states we act and think differently when we are "in the dark", that is, when the spotlight is not on us and everyone can see us and consequently judge us. When reading, we tend to be sympathetic to some characters and their dilemmas. By being so, we are saying to ourselves that we agree with those characters' acts and choices, even if they are morally questionable if we have common sense in mind.