Q.1 What were feedom riders?
The Freedom Rides of 1961 was a revolutionary movement where black and white people refused to sit in their designated areas of buses to protest segregation. Blacks sat in the front of the bus and whites sat in the back, opposite of the usual arrangements. There were multiple different rides from several different locations and a variety of people. At every stop, the freedom riders would use the opposite segregated facilities such as bathrooms, restaurants, and water fountains
Q.2.where and when?
They began in Washington DC on May 4, 1961 and went to New Orleans originally. But the rides sparked a revolution and inspired many other people from several states to take part in the freedom rides and support the fight for racial justice.
Q.3who was involved?
The idea was conceived by The Congress of Racial Equality and the first ride involved 7 blacks and 6 whites who boarded the bus in Washington D.C. Many Freedom Riders were trained Civil Rights Activists who practiced peaceful protest and lead with bravery. Some were even involved in the diner sit in's the year before.
Q.4.why?
They intended to test the Supreme Court's ruling in Boynton v. Virginia (1960), which declared segregation in interstate bus and rail stations unconstitutional but was failing to be enforced.
Boynton vs Virginia was a court case about a man named Bruce Boynton who was in a restaurant within a "white only" bus terminal and refused to leave. He was arrested for trespassing, but the offense was turned over by the Supreme Court because "white only" and "black only" areas were deemed unconstitutional through Brown v. Board of Education (1954).
This was also the next step towards anti-segregation that promoted the ideas brought on by diner sit in's that took place in the previous year.
The Freedom Rides also had the goal of gaining not only public attention but also the attention of the Kennedy Association in order to raise awareness of the rising Civil Rights Movement.
<h3>
1) What are the consequences of this war that we might want to care about? </h3>
though many American grievances were resolved during the course of the war, the Treaty of Ghent, which formally ended the War of 1812, involved no significant change in pre-war borders or boundaries. For Native Americans who had allied with the British, the war devastated their physical land and political autonomy.
<h3>
2)Why are we talking about the War of 1812?</h3>
The reasons for war included the British habit of forcing American merchant sailors into the Royal Navy, as well as trade restrictions on the US as a side-effect of Britain's seemingly endless war with France
<h3>I dont know the
answer to the other ones.. lol </h3><h3 /><h2>
Facts you got to know!:</h2>
° What were the 3 outcomes of the War of 1812?
The United States suffered many costly defeats at the hands of British, Canadian and Native American troops over the course of the War of 1812, including the capture and burning of the nation's capital, Washington, D.C., in August 1814.
° Who won War of 1812?
In early 1815, the Americans decisively defeated the invading British Army attacking New Orleans, Louisiana. Fighting also took place in Spanish Florida; a two-day battle for the city of Pensacola ended in Spanish surrender.
The best evidence that the Taliban began a "lightning offensive" and overran Afghanistan is option D.
In August 2021, the Taliban launched a lightening offensive across Afghanistan. The success of this offensive surprised everyone including the Taliban.
The Taliban were able to capture most of the country including the capital in less than a month because:
- the Taliban had a morale boost from the U.S. pulling out ahead of schedule
- Afghan army units were surrendering to the Taliban across the nation
In conclusion, option D is correct because it shows how fast the Taliban were able to capture Afghanistan and why they were able to.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/12326725.</em>
Answer: It helps people realize that people should stop killing and find another way to handle the problem or prove the problem not just think someone is a witch.
Explanation:
