Answer:
Sea of Darkness
Explanation:
Before the discovery of America by Christopher Columbus, many of the early sailors call the Atlantic ocean s sea of darkness. European called the mysterious sea to have monsters and the fear, scared sailors who did not want to cross the Ocean. This myth was broken by Columbus when he decided to take a new sea route from the East to find India.
First question: he started making alliances after coming to power and a war did happen, so we have to choose amog the two other options:
give powerful and persuasive speeches
create industry and employment where none existed
I find that they're both true and that an even better answer would be that he gave people huge promises of making Italy great again.
If I can choose only one option, then "speeches" is better, since the other one required him to be in power already to do
second question: while the last option did happen, as minorities were persecuted, the major mechanism of keeping the population in control was controlling resistance, so the correct answer is the first one.
The effect of john brown leading attacks on harpers ferry is federal troops begin capturing southern territories.
<h3>Who was Harpers Ferry?</h3>
John Brown attacked harpers ferry hoping to capture the arsenal and start a slave rebellion in the south.
Federal troops begin capturing southern territories was the major effect of john brown leading attacks on harpers ferry.
Therefore, D is the correct option.
Learn more about Harpers Ferry here:
brainly.com/question/10301178
#SPJ1
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
According to Dr. John C Green, debates actually matters in an election. However, the impact of debates comes in two different folds.
Firstly, those that actually watch the debate. These people get the information directly from the aspirants and it shifts their opinions about who they will vote for eventually.
On the other hand, are those that actually didn't watch the debate. These people often more than those that watch the debate, are influenced by the media narratives that come after the debates. And in a way, it also changes their opinions about whom exactly they would give their votes.
He however concluded that it is difficult to measure the impact of the debate on election outcomes. In his word "just because people get information does not mean they will be persuaded one way or another."
