1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lakkis [162]
3 years ago
13

What events in history have resulted from natural rights?

History
1 answer:
Lostsunrise [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

answer below!

Explanation: The 40 Principal Doctrines of the Epicureans taught that "in order to obtain protection from other men, any means for attaining this end is a natural good" (PD 6). They believed in a contractarian ethics where mortals agree to not harm or be harmed, and the rules that govern their agreements are not absolute (PD 33), but must change with circumstances (PD 37-38). The Epicurean doctrines imply that humans in their natural state enjoy personal sovereignty and that they must consent to the laws that govern them, and that this consent (and the laws) can be revisited periodically when circumstances change.[11]

The Stoics held that no one was a slave by nature; slavery was an external condition juxtaposed to the internal freedom of the soul (sui juris). Seneca the Younger wrote:

It is a mistake to imagine that slavery pervades a man's whole being; the better part of him is exempt from it: the body indeed is subjected and in the power of a master, but the mind is independent, and indeed is so free and wild, that it cannot be restrained even by this prison of the body, wherein it is confined.[12]

Of fundamental importance to the development of the idea of natural rights was the emergence of the idea of natural human equality. As the historian A.J. Carlyle notes: "There is no change in political theory so startling in its completeness as the change from the theory of Aristotle to the later philosophical view represented by Cicero and Seneca.... We think that this cannot be better exemplified than with regard to the theory of the equality of human nature."[13] Charles H. McIlwain likewise observes that "the idea of the equality of men is the profoundest contribution of the Stoics to political thought" and that "its greatest influence is in the changed conception of law that in part resulted from it."[14] Cicero argues in De Legibus that "we are born for Justice, and that right is based, not upon opinions, but upon Nature.

You might be interested in
What is david wootens main argument in his book " The invention of science "
Neko [114]

Answer:

Wootton argues that the Scientific Revolution was actually five separate yet concurrent events that developed independently but came to intersect and create a new worldview.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What process did states use to decide whether to ratify the constitution apex?
nadezda [96]
The held state conventions where the representative voted for or against the ratification.
Citizens did not vote to ratify the constitution directly as in referendums. The ratification therefore did not take place immediately and over 78 amendments were proposed in the course of the ratification process.

<span />
6 0
3 years ago
Hello i am amar 7488 <br>please tell me about <br>windows 10​
Alchen [17]

Answer:

hello amar............

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a subsidy, and why is it important to cultural development
nadya68 [22]
<span>A subsidy is money that is given to industries to help keep the service or product available at a reasonable price. Subsidies are important to cultural development because they allow for vital resources to remain available despite the financial burden placed on the provider.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Why did some regions support the constitution and others did not?
choli [55]
The people who opposed the new Constitution of the United States were called Anti-Federalists. They believed that the new government under the Constitution did not emphasize liberty and would mean that the citizen's rights would be restricted. Many were concerned because there was no "Bill of Rights" included in the new Constitution. Some sort of "restriction" on the power of the national government was necessary. Many Anti-Federalists felt that protecting liberties could only succeed in a small republic in which the rulers were close to the people. Only a "confederation" of states could adequately protect citizen's liberties. The new government under the Constitution would take over the job of the states, would over tax the people, and the federal courts would overrule the state courts. Many also feared that the president would command a large standing army which could use force to uphold the laws of the national government at the expense of the state governments.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Was the Messerschmitt 262 the first jet fighter?
    11·1 answer
  • During the constitution convention who pushed for a strong republic but didn't want to mode the American system after the Britis
    6·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the flying buttress?
    10·1 answer
  • This woman was captured by Northern forces and eventually married a Union officer.
    9·1 answer
  • If you were telling the story of European States and Empires in 1750, how would the narrative differ if you lived in the contine
    6·1 answer
  • What effect did nationalism have on european nations in the lead up to world war 1
    12·1 answer
  • Rossini was noted for writing music that represents what kind of weather?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes the role of women during the early 1900s?
    11·2 answers
  • Students want to see if plants need sunlight to grow. They have 4 plants that are all the same kind. They put 2 of them in a sun
    6·1 answer
  • which group supported and which opposed tariffs? Do you think the American System offer a good solution to regional difference
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!