1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
k0ka [10]
3 years ago
5

What two separate agreements did britain negotiate during wwi?

History
1 answer:
jarptica [38.1K]3 years ago
8 0
The Skye-Picot agreement was the the agreement during world war one.
You might be interested in
The Fertile Crescent included Mesopotamia. True or false
andrew11 [14]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Siddhartha Gautama had visions of a sick man, an old man, a dying man, and an____ A cand man Please select the best answer from
IgorLugansk [536]

Answer:

omg I have the same question

Explanation:

please message me if anyone answers you

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the rise of constantinople contribute to roman culture
Tcecarenko [31]
It's because Roman culture did not disappear because the traditions were kept alive by leaders in Constantinople.
You can see that many features in the city of Constantine is made based on the design that was taken from the Roman period and the interior usually filled with Roman artworks. Not only that, many ceremonies and celebrations is being done based on Roman tradition. 
<span />
3 0
3 years ago
The imperial capital at Heian, also known as ________, was once the Japanese center of art, literature, and learning.
Marizza181 [45]

Answer:

The imperial Capital of Heian is Kyōto

Explanation:

Heian period, in Japanese history, the period between 794 and 1185, named for the location of the imperial capital, which was moved from Nara to Heian-kyō (Kyōto) in 794.

5 0
3 years ago
What was president carters response to the soviet unions invasion of Afghanistan in 1979
Aliun [14]
I come to you this evening to discuss the extremely important and rapidly changing circumstances in Southwest Asia. . . .

. . . Massive Soviet military forces have invaded the small, nonaligned, sovereign nation of Afghanistan, which had hitherto not been an occupied satellite of the Soviet Union.

Fifty thousand heavily armed Soviet troops have crossed the border and are now dispersed throughout Afghanistan, attempting to conquer the fiercely independent Muslim people of that country.

The Soviets claim, falsely, that they were invited into Afghanistan to help protect that country from some unnamed outside threat. But the President, who had been the leader of Afghanistan before the Soviet invasion, was assassinated – along with several members of his family – after the Soviets gained control of the capital city of Kabul. Only several days later was the new puppet leader even brought into Afghanistan by the Soviets.

This invasion is an extremely serious threat to peace because of the threat of further Soviet expansion into neighboring countries in Southwest Asia and also because such an aggressive military policy is unsettling to other peoples throughout the world.

This is a callous violation of international law and the United Nations Charter. It is a deliberate effort of a powerful atheistic government to subjugate an independent Islamic people.

We must recognize the strategic importance of Afghanistan to stability and peace. A Soviet-occupied Afghanistan threatens both Iran and Pakistan and is a steppingstone to possible control over much of the world’s oil supplies.

The United States wants all nations in the region to be free and to be independent. If the Soviets are encouraged in this invasion by eventual success, and if they maintain their dominance over Afghanistan and then extend their control to adjacent countries, the stable, strategic, and peaceful balance of the entire world will be changed. This would threaten the security of all nations including, of course, the United States, our allies, and our friends.

Therefore, the world simply cannot stand by and permit the Soviet Union to commit this act with impunity. Fifty nations have petitioned the United Nations Security Council to condemn the Soviet Union and to demand the immediate withdrawal of all Soviet troops from Afghanistan.

. . . [N]either the United States nor any other nation which is committed to world peace and stability can continue to do business as usual with the Soviet Union.

I have already recalled the United States Ambassador from Moscow back to Washington. He’s working with me and with my other senior advisers in an immediate and comprehensive evaluation of the whole range of our relations with the Soviet Union.

The successful negotiation of the SALT II treaty1 has been a major goal and a major achievement of this administration, and we Americans, the people of the Soviet Union, and indeed the entire world will benefit from the successful control of strategic nuclear weapons through the implementation of this carefully negotiated treaty.

However, because of the Soviet aggression, I have asked the United States Senate to defer further consideration of the SALT II treaty so that the Congress and I can assess Soviet actions and intentions and devote our primary attention to the legislative and other measures required to respond to this crisis. As circumstances change in the future, we will, of course, keep the ratification of SALT II under active review in consultation with the leaders of the Senate.

The Soviets must understand our deep concern. We will delay opening of any new American or Soviet consular facilities, and most of the cultural and economic exchanges currently under consideration will be deferred. Trade with the Soviet Union will be severely restricted. . . .

Along with other countries, we will provide military equipment, food, and other assistance to help Pakistan defend its independence and its national security against the seriously increased threat it now faces from the north. The United States also stands ready to help other nations in the region in similar ways.

Neither our allies nor our potential adversaries should have the slightest doubt about our willingness, our determination, and our capacity to take the measures I have outlined tonight. I have consulted with leaders of the Congress, and I am confident they will support legislation that may be required to carry out these measures.

History teaches, perhaps, very few clear lessons. But surely one such lesson learned by the world at great cost is that aggression, unopposed, becomes a contagious disease. . . .
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is one success and one failure of the U.S. Foreign policy in Asia from 1945-1955????
    11·1 answer
  • In 330 C.E., what did Emperor Constantine do that led to the beginning of the Byzantine Empire?
    12·1 answer
  • What major event caused national leaders to finally realize that they needed a stronger national government?
    14·2 answers
  • Which philosopher classified government as republics monarchies and despotisms
    12·1 answer
  • According to the quote, who does Las Casas say slavery is against?
    10·1 answer
  • How did political power in Japan shift between 794 and 1192 A.D?
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following would have been prevented by the series of checks and balances in the Roman Republic?
    9·1 answer
  • The questions of economics address which of the following? Check all that apply.
    8·2 answers
  • Hey does azzyland have a acount on brainly
    5·1 answer
  • (1) Where would an American in the 1920s have gone to enjoy "talkies”?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!