<u><em>Answer:</em></u>
<u><em>I think B. But I may be wrong :/</em></u>
<u><em>Explanation:</em></u>
<u><em>Please give me brainliest :)</em></u>
Answer:
i think its a, srry if im wrong
Explanation:
Answer:
la agricultura se revolucion en el año de la mesopotamia
Answer and Explanation:
Sustainability is feasible with enhancements in innovation. Current advances make it conceivable to run feasible businesses, yet these are monetarily unfeasible because of our enormous vitality needs.The proficiency of current innovations in changing over vitality to progressively usable structures for example sun powered, wind,tidal and so forth are likewise low, mostly because of innovative boundaries, making huge scale maintainability unachievable,despite the accessibility of enough crude vitality to suit human needs. Consequently, we have the crude vitality lying around, we should simply change over it to a usable structure. Therefore, levels of progress at littler scales just as the nearness of crude vitality for enormous scale support ability are two reasons why manageability is reachable
As referenced above,the primary hindrance to accomplishing supportability is an absence of innovation to understand this. Another significant obstruction is the tremendous populace. A higher populace requests higher vitality, consequently, considerably more vitality should be delivered. At lower levels, manageability is all the more effectively come to even with our current innovative head ways. With a lower populace, while we may not accomplish manageability completely, we could at present bear to utilize assets in a progressively controlled way, and not deplete our current stores at a disturbing rate while we anticipate advancements in economical innovations.
One more boundary is our monetary framework which rewards snappy and quick generation over maintainable development, in this manner organizations will in general center around amplifying benefits instead of accomplishing supportability.
Answer: The Siloviki
Explanation: Siloviki is a Russian political term for those politicians, so the plural is in question, the singular is a silovik, who came into politics from some of the security forces, i.e. military, police or similar services. It could also be the secret services that come from some of the former security structures like the KGB and the like. Given that Putin is known as a strong steel arm leader, it is logical that he is attached to such organisations that can provide him with such firmness in his rule. On the other hand, a non-political organisation, a democratically oriented urban middle class is always against this type of governing.