The problem with using the sentence "I agree with Mr. Jones's contention that the government is not meeting the healthcare needs of the middle-class American" in a research paper is, it uses first person point of view.
Answer: Option B.
Explanation:
Research paper is a type of academic writing where a person analyses, and interprets the information bases on the original work. Such type of writing often discourage the use of first person point of view.
In the sentence, I’ agree with Mr. Jones's contention that the government is not meeting the healthcare needs of the middle-class American’, ‘I’ represents the first person pronoun. Such sentences cannot be used in research paper because it may result in personal bias and might also sound opinionated.
I would say that the fragment is either C or D. I'm leaning more towards D though.
Incomplete question. here are the options:
A. attitudes toward tedious labor
B) solutions to a long-standing problem
C) two distinct perspectives of the world
D) personal beliefs about honorable conduct
E) opposing sides in a controversy
Answer:
A. attitudes toward tedious labor
Explanation:
A simile is a figure of speech used to compare one thing with another thing of a different kind.
The words of line 40 reads;
<em>"In each hand, </em><em>like an old-stone savage armed</em>
<em>He moves in darkness as it seems to me, Not of woods only and the shade of trees.</em>
<em>He will not go behind his father's saying And he likes having thought of it so well."</em>
Hence, the speaker likens "each hand" to an "old stone" in other to make a contrast between attitudes toward tedious labor which is evident if we examine previous lines.
If it is a choosing answer, I would pick delicious pizza.
If you picked burning hot wings it will maybe be burnt.
For warm tasty pasta I will also pick that.
But it is your choice to decide :)
So, I will highly recommend delicious pizza and the tasty pasta.
Hope this helped. :)
