1. B - It allows people the freedom to criticize public officials.
When the citizens had the freedom to cricitize its own government, the government would be forced to live up to a certain standard. This would dramatically reduce the complacency within the government body, and the government become more likely to listen and create legislations that satisfy the majority of people.
2. A. Journalists are entitled to cover trials
and
C. It is difficult for public officials to win libel cases.
Through this, the journalist could act as a middle man that connect what happen within the government body, transform it into pieces of information, and give it to the people so we can form our own opinion about it. Difficulties to win libel cases favours journalists because it allow them to criticize public officials without direct threat of of being sued for smearing their name.
Answer:
I hope this is what you mean
Explanation:
Restricting output onto the market. Charging a higher price than in a more competitive market. Reducing consumer surplus and economic welfare.
Abraham Lincoln differed from Jefferson Davis in that Davis "<span>(B) had great experience in government and leadership," although it should be noted that Lincoln was ultimately a better leader than Davis in many ways. </span>
Hi there
The answer to your question is elections
Hoped I Helped
President Nixon was left in a great deal of debt following the Watergate scandal and the loss of his presidency. Despite having secured publishing and consulting positions, Nixon was still in terrible financial straits. He sold his apartment - rather dramatically - in order to support himself and his family.