Answer:
To many historians, the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century CE has always been viewed as the end of the ancient world and the onset of the Middle Ages, often improperly called the Dark Ages, despite Petrarch’s assertion. Since much of the west had already fallen by the middle of the 5th century CE, when a writer speaks of the fall of the empire, he or she generally refers to the fall of the city of Rome. Although historians generally agree on the year of the fall, 476 CE, they often disagree on its causes. English historian Edward Gibbon, who wrote in the late 18th century CE, points to the rise of Christianity and its effect on the Roman psyche while others believe the decline and fall were due, in part, to the influx of 'barbarians' from the north and west.
Explanation:
I hope this kinda helps u :D
Answer:
The answer is D. This is because it isn't a form of currency, it was not backed by gold, silver, or land, and it was not an economic success.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
The North had international legitimacy. Other nations recognized the North and could provide trade and credit. The Confederacy, on the other hand, never received international recognition. While Britain unofficially built commerce raiders for the South, the states in rebellion could not rely on international aid.
The North had more fighting men than the South. Eventually this would come to bear in terms of both supplying men to fight as well as men to provide supplies and food to the armies. The South could not afford a long war of attrition. The quality of troops in the North increased as the war progressed, while the South was taking the young and the old to fill its ranks before the war was over.
The North had greater infrastructure. Railroads allowed the North to ship men and supplies where they were needed most. Lee's final retreat to Appomattox was plagued by a poorly organized rail service. Even before the war, the South lacked railroad investment.
The North also had a moral reason...
Answer:
A careful reading of the First Amendment reveals that it protects several basic liberties — freedom of religion, speech, press, petition, and assembly. Interpretation of the amendment is far from easy, as court case after court case has tried to define the limits of these freedoms.
Explanation:
The British government and people relied on their naval control and superiority to maintain control over things like trade and to have power and wealth. When Germany started building numerous warships and being competition to them, they felt threatened because they knew that they could lose their naval supremacy and control over waters.
