Really in today's modern day it would be,
D. They are humans who blend into everyday society
For example, superman and spiderman
welcome :/
Answer:
are
Explanation:
The word "are" describes multiple people in an action. So, the correct answer would be Tommy and I <u>are</u> good at physics.
Dw/dt = k(1200 - w)
dw/(1200 - w) = kdt
-ln(1200 - w) = kt + c
When t = 0, w = 60
-ln(1200 - 60) = c
c = -ln(1140)
a.) For k = 0.8: -ln(1200 - w) = 0.8t - ln(1140)
t = [ln(1140) - ln(1200 - w)]/0.8
For k = 0.9:
t = [ln(1140) - ln(1200 - w)]/0.9
For k = 1:
t = [ln(1140) - ln(1200 - w)]
b.) For k = 0.8
t = [ln(1140) - ln(1200 - 800)]/0.8 = [ln(1140) - ln(400)]/0.8 = 1.3 years
For k = 0.9
t = [ln(1140) - ln(400)]/0.9 = 1.16 years
For k = 1
t = [ln(1140) - ln(400)] = 1.05 years
c.) For maximum weight,
dw/dt = 0
k(1200 - w) = 0
1200 - w = 0
w = 1200
Therefore, the maximum weight for each of the model is 1200 pounds.
THIS ISN'T THE ANSWER, only adding on to the question. Excerpt: When I addressed the Congress on the 26th of February last, I thought that it would suffice to assert our neutral rights with arms, our right to use the seas against unlawful interference, our right to keep our people safe against unlawful violence. But armed neutrality, it now appears, is impracticable. Because submarines are in effect outlaws when used as the German submarines have been used against merchant shipping, it is impossible to defend ships against their attacks as the law of nations has assumed that merchantmen would defend themselves against privateers or cruisers, visible craft giving chase upon the open sea.
It is common prudence in such circumstances, grim necessity indeed, to endeavor to destroy them before they have shown their own intention. They must be dealt with upon sight, if dealt with at all. The German government denies the right of neutrals to use arms at all within the areas of the sea which it has proscribed, even in the defense of rights which no modern publicist has ever before questioned their right to defend. The intimation is conveyed that the armed guards which we have placed on our merchant ships will be treated as beyond the pale of law and subject to be dealt with as pirates would be.
Armed neutrality is ineffectual enough at best; in such circumstances and in the face of such pretensions it is worse than ineffectual: it is likely only to produce what it was meant to prevent; it is practically certain to draw us into the war without either the rights or the effectiveness of belligerents. There is one choice we cannot make, we are incapable of making: we will not choose the path of submission and suffer the most sacred rights of our nation and our people to be ignored or violated. The wrongs against which we now array ourselves are no common wrongs; they cut to the very roots of human life.
Answer: In the first quatrain Shakespeare explains the unconditional aspects of love. Love does not change when circumstances change.
In the second quatrain love is an ideal, a guide, a stronghold. When someone is lost, love shows the way.
The third quatrain illustrates the longevity of love. It endures to the end.
In the couplet, Shakespeare asserts the truth if his observations and description of love. If proven wrong, it is as if he has never written anything, and no one has ever experienced love.
Explanation:
