The last option should be the answer hope this helps!! :)
Answer:
A historian’s point of view
Explanation:
The main evidence attesting that a historian wrote this excerpt is the neutral description of the information. A professional historian's concern is not to judge Columbus's conduct. Instead, the historian's task is to show the historical evidence - dates, events, names, and actions results - and explain the situation. Another fact is the source and strict information in the content.
The sudden end to the slave economy would have had a profound and killing economic impact in the South where reliance on slave labor was the foundation of their economy
In 1951, a jury convicted this couple of conspiracy to pass secrets concerning the atomic bomb to Soviet agents during World War II.--<u>Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.</u>
<u></u>
<h3>What was the evidence that convicted the Rosenbergs?</h3>
The only direct evidence of the Rosenberg's involvement was the confession of Greenglass. The left-wing community believed that the Rosenbergs were prosecuted because of their membership in the Communist Party. Their case became the cause célèbre of leftists throughout the nation.
<h3>Who was convicted of giving the US atomic secrets to the Soviet Union?</h3>
In June 1953, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were executed for conspiring to commit espionage under the American Espionage Act of 1917. Communist Party members, the Rosenbergs were convicted of transmitting secret information. about the atomic bomb for the Soviet Union in 1945.
Learn more about Soviet union:
brainly.com/question/1060972
#SPJ4
