Answer:
8. Yadier and Max are BROTHERS.
✔Predicate noun
9. Tyler handed KENTASIA the list.
✔Indirect object
Explanation:
The above are the correct answers.
Predicate noun is known to be a noun or noun phrase which gives additional information about the subject of the sentence. They follow linking verbs because they are there to show a state of being. Some of the linking verbs that come before predicate noun: is, are, am, was, were, being, and been.
So, "BROTHERS" is the predicate noun that gives us more information about Yadier and Max.
Indirect Object is that part of the sentence that gives us the answer to whom or for whom the direct object was given. It gives more information on who receives the action. In other words, indirect object receives the direct object.
In the No. 9 sentence, Tyler is the subject, handed is the verb, the list is the direct object. To whom was the list given? KENTASIA.
4. D. Andy was shocked and horrified to hear the details of how Ann was killed and felt her loss more deeply.
5. C. “‘Hearing Conor,’ he said, ‘I made sounds I’ve never heard myself make. To hear that your daughter was on the floor saying ‘no’ and holding her hands up and still be shot is just — it’s just not...’ He tried to explain the horror of such knowledge, but it’s not easy.” ( Paragraph 92)
This evidence best proves the answer to question #4 and explains why #4 is correct. In option C, it specifically states Andy's reaction to Conor's account of Ann's murder. Listening to Conor tell about how Ann was on the floor and saying, "no" while she was helpless to stop him, horrified and shocked Andy. The narrator specifically says that the horror of the knowledge was hard for him to explain.
Greek Gods mentioned in oedipus
Homer<span>, </span>Hesiod<span>, </span>Pindar<span>, </span>Aeschylus<span> and </span>Euripides<span>. </span><span />
The Maasai are thought of as the typical cattle herders of Africa, yet they have not always been herders, nor are they all today. Because of population growth, development strategies, and the resulting shortage of land, cattle raising is in decline. However, cattle still represent "the breath of life" for many Maasai. When given the chance, they choose herding above all other livelihoods. For many Westerners, the Maasai are Hollywood's "noble savage"—fierce, proud, handsome, graceful of bearing, and elegantly tall. Hair smeared red with ochre (a pigment), they either carry spears or stand on one foot tending cattle. These depictions oversimplify Maasai life during the twentieth century. Today, Maasai cattle herders may also be growing maize (corn) or wheat, rearing Guinea fowl, raising ostriches, or may be hired by ecologists to take pictures of the countryside.
Prior to British colonization, Africans, Arabs, and European explorers considered the Maasai formidable warriors for their conquests of neighboring peoples and their resistance to slavery. Caravan traders traveling from the coast to Uganda crossed Maasailandwith trepidation. However, in 1880–81, when the British unintentionally introduced rinderpest (a cattle disease), the Maasai lost 80 percent of their stock. The British colonizers further disrupted Maasai life by moving them to a reserve in southern Kenya. While the British encouraged them to adopt European ways, they also advised them to retain their traditions. These contradictions resulted, for the most part, in leaving the Maasai alone and allowed them to develop almost on their own. However, drought, famine, cattle diseases, and intratribal warfare (warfare among themselves) in the nineteenth century greatly weakened the Maasai and nearly destrtoyed certain tribes.
<span>
Read more: <span>http://www.everyculture.com/wc/Tajikistan-to-Zimbabwe/Maasai.html#ixzz4lDPcYFKL</span></span>
