Answer:
<u>Sample Response: </u>The argument in favor of social media use is the stronger argument. The article claims that students do better in school when they use social media. The author gives anecdotal evidence that students use social media to discuss classwork, then uses empirical evidence to show that grades went up in a study where students used social media. The argument against social media is weak because it lacks specific evidence. The writer uses the rhetorical device of parallelism to list a variety of ill effects of social media use. However, the writer never offers any evidence for these negative effects. This writer uses the bandwagon fallacy by telling the audience that most people who want to do well do not use social media.
Explanation:
I just did the assignment.
Two types of argument would be a non-emergency argument meaning it does not really count, it will be over later. And the seccond argument would be a emergency argument meaning it would actually count towards something. The emergency argument is more important
By the way, this difference between us remains much the same to this very day.
Explanation:
Did someone pay the bills?
It means you're talking with an adult? it doesn't mean anything bad, if that's what you're asking.<span />
