Lets make an equation for the line first. The slope is 3 and the y intercept is -1, so we can make the equation y = 3x - 1. Then, to figure out what sign to use (<= or >= due to solid line in graph), we replace the = sign with one and see if a coordinate in the shaded area will furfill the inequality. If it doesn't, we know it needs the other inequality sign. If it does, we have found the correct inequality. So let's try y <= 3x - 1 with the coordinate (1,1). We try it, solve, and get 1 <= 2. So, the inequality for this graph is y <= 3x - 1.
No, (9.5, 144) does not make sense because there is no point of 9.5 and when you divide the ounces of water by the flavoring packets you end up with 12, and if you were to simplify that it would end up with 1 flavor packet and 12 ounces of water.
Answer:
The measure of the side 
is 8.8.
Step-by-step explanation:
Since 
, then 
, 
, 
and 
. From figure we have the following relationship:
(1)
Where 
is the proportionality ratio.
If we know that 
, then the measure of side is:
(1b)
(1c)
The measure of the side is 8.8.
Answer:
a) 4:3
b) 7:3
Step-by-step explanation:
No. of roses= 8
No. of daisies = 6
Total no. of flowers = 14
a) Ratio of roses to daisies = No. of roses/No. of daisies
8/6
= 4/3
= 4:3
b) Ratio of all flowers to daisies = No. of all flowers/ No. of daisies
14/6
= 7/3
= 7:3
Answer:
In the graph attached there is a sample generated with a correlation coefficient r=-0.5.
Step-by-step explanation:
A value of r that is -0.5 shows that there is a certain correlation and that this correlation is negative.
As there are no examples in this question, I searched for a generator of random samples with a user-input correlation coefficient between the two variables.
In the graph attached there is a sample generated with a correlation coefficient r=-0.5.
