Answer:
It was based on the belief that segregation was permissible as long as the facilities were equal.
Explanation:
This was over turned by Brown V Board of Education
<span>This discovery activity puts students in the place of real volcanologists by giving them access to real-time data from Kilauea Volcano, Hawaii. They learn about volcano monitoring techniques, study case histories of important volcanic processes, and then form and test hypotheses for past and future volcanic events with multiple instruments and real-time data. As a result, students will understand the processes that shape a basaltic shield volcano.</span>
Answer: a bibliography is a way to take notes using note cards, source cards and electronic options.
Explanation:
A response is a reaction to a text or an exercise. The central idea of the response above is about making complex sentences simply by changing comma splices into full stops or periods.
<h3>What is a complex sentence?</h3>
A sentence comprising one independent clause and at least one dependent clause is called a complex sentence.
Hence, it is correct to state that the central idea of the response above is about making complex sentences simply by changing comma splices into full stops or periods.
Learn more about complex sentences at:
brainly.com/question/17538242
#SPJ1
The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!
