Answer: Although they lost the black box, using stone is part of the ritual
Explanation:
Although the may have forgotten the ritual and lost the black box, but townspeople remember the use of stone on any one that pick a paper with black dot.
Answer and Explanation:
Sherlock Holes and Dr. Watson are fictional characters created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Holmes is a well-known and highly intelligent researcher, who is efficiently assisted by Dr. Watson in a series of books.
Although this pair of characters has become iconic and has been portrayed in several adaptations, as well as being a symbol of current pop culture, there are many differences and similarities between the two. Among the similarities we can mention the fact that both are extremely intelligent, correct and cultured men. However, we cannot deny that Holmes is a more focused and observant character, which ensures that he makes such incredible discoveries. Dr. Holmes, on the other hand, is a more science, study, and philosophy-oriented man, which provides highly effective support for Holmes' discoveries.
The difference between the two characters makes them complete each other and are such a dynamic duo, where each complements the other's flaws. However, the differences between them, promote a striking personality in each one and this was the main objective of the author to unite such contrasting personalities, but that work so well.
Answer:
Fake news should not be trusted because, they do not have proper information, it is bias, and it could be misleading compared to what really happened.
Explanation:
Answer:
It is difficult to discern whether individuals can be designated as having good morals when an action is done not because it was moral, but because God has commanded it.
Explanation:
The idea of Theological Volunteerism is that an action has moral value because the action is approved or even recommended by God, through his teachings. In this context, what we as humans might consider as something that is morally right, may be considered in opposition to God's will or even deemed as irrelevant since it was not taught by God of certain religions as a morally right action that their follower should take.
A great example of this would be the idea of slaughtering some farm animals under the name of God for it to be consumed by the followers of the religion, even though it means that the method used to kill these animals is more inhumane. To the followers of the religion, this action is morally right since God has commanded it to be so; to those who aren't followers of the religion, it is a horrific and morally wrong action.
Answer:yes because he’s popular
Explanation:
Guessed
