I have no idea, but the closest thing I could find was a quote saying, "snapping the shutter"
The size of florida is 170000 (170,304 km² to be precise)
The term social Darwinism is used to refer to the diverse ideas that emerged in the second half of the 19th century and that attempted to apply a decontextualized reading of natural selection to human society. The term appeared in the 1880s, and gained wide circulation after 1944.
Social Darwinism can be summed up in a supposed “theory” of the evolution of society. Such an idea defended the existence of societies superior to the others and that, in this condition, those that stood out physically and intellectually should become dominant, while the others - less apt - would cease to exist because they would not be able to follow the evolutionary line of society.
The French expression “laissez faire, laissez passer” (Let it go, let it go) sums up a principle dear to liberals who defend economic freedom.
For liberals, the individual is the economic agent and, for this reason, the State must not interfere in economic activities with many rules. If there is any mismatch, the market itself will correct it naturally, that is, it is self-regulating.
Liberalism is responsible for maintaining order, preserving peace and protecting private property.
Answer:
There are two major problems with foreign aid.
The first is that it tends to involve solutions that are developed and implemented by outside actors with little input from communities. Providing solutions to problems that don't exist, or providing the wrong solutions to problems that do exist, are great ways to waste money. Unfortunately, aid structures tend to operate in a way that create disincentives for seeking out community input. Aid actors typically need to present a fully-formed project plan to be considered for funding, yet aid actors need initial funding in order to determine needs and create a locally tailored and sustainable project. It's a vicious cycle that feeds on ignorance.
That leads to the second problem: a lack of monitoring and evaluation. It's only in the last ten years or so that major international institutions like the World Bank have even begun including monitoring and evaluation in project plans, much less prioritizing it. Without M&E, it's impossible to learn what actions and processes are effective, and which cause more problems. That international development in the modern sense has been happening for some 50+ years (and by some evaluations for some 100+ years before that), but only 10 of those have involved any sort of mass movement to evaluate effectiveness, is likely a major reason that so many major aid projects have not seen the intended results.
As a result of these two major issues (as well as other systemic problems within the development community), aid projects have, in some cases, done a great deal of harm.
