1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
eimsori [14]
3 years ago
9

What increased cotton processing?

History
2 answers:
Olenka [21]3 years ago
6 0
The invention of the cotton gin. 
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]3 years ago
3 0

U.S. History The Market Revolution
Concept Version 10
Created by Boundless
1
1
The Growth of the Cotton Industry
Assign Concept Reading
View Quiz
Eli Whitney's invention of the cotton gin in 1793 resulted in massive growth in the cotton industry in the American South.


LEARNING OBJECTIVE[ edit ]

Describe the economic and political effects of Eli Whitney's cotton gin

KEY POINTS[ edit ]

With the invention of Eli Whitney's cotton gin in 1793, cotton became a tremendously profitable industry, creating many fortunes for white plantation owners in the antebellum South.
The cotton gin (short for "cotton engine") was a machine that quickly and easily separated cotton fibers from their seeds, a job that otherwise had to be performed painstakingly by hand, most often by slaves.
Cotton soon became the primary export in the United States and by 1860, on the eve of the Civil War, the southern states were providing two-thirds of the world's supply of cotton.
The textile boom in New England created an important domestic market for cotton producers. Cotton plantations depended on slave labor, and as a result of the boom in this industry, slavery increased dramatically in the early nineteenth century.
Due to its profound effect on American slavery, the growth of the cotton industry is frequently cited as one of the causes of the American Civil War.


Source: Boundless. “The Growth of the Cotton Industry.” Boundless U.S. History Boundless, 12 Sep. 2016. Retrieved 29 Jan. 2017 from https://www.boundless.com/u-s-history/textbooks/boundless-u-s-history-textbook/the-market-revolution-1815-1840-13/the-market-revolution-108/the-growth-of-the-cotton-industry-583-1160/
You might be interested in
Lincoln's handling of the “Trent Affair" was very important because:
erma4kov [3.2K]

Answer:

Lincoln's handling of the Trent affair was important because US was undergoing a civil war then and angering Britian could have proven to be dangerous.

Explanation:

  • In the Trent affair, President Lincoln walked a thin diplomatic line.
  • The Trent Affair was a diplomatic crisis that occured between the US and Britain from November to December 1861, during the U.S. Civil War.
  • This mishap occured after the captain of the USS San Jacinto demanded the arrest of two Confederate messengers travelling to Europe aboard a British mail ship, the Trent, in order to seek support for the South in the Civil War.
  • The British, who had remained neutral in the war, were angered and claimed the seizure of a neutral ship by the U.S. Navy was a violation of international law. And they took immediate action banning export and preparing for an immediate armed conflict.
  • The messengers were later released to avoid potential war.
3 0
4 years ago
Why did Gandhi encourage Indians to weave their own cloth?
SSSSS [86.1K]
Because textiles where a major source of income for britain.
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
During the reign of Francisco Franco, government in Spain was
Brilliant_brown [7]
A general and the leader of nationalist forces
7 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the united states pay for the louisiana purchase
jonny [76]

Answer:

we payed france $15 million for the territory that doubled the us

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Analyze the similarities and differences in the methods used by cavour and bismarck to bring about the unification of italy and
sammy [17]

There are various similarities and differences observed in the methods used by Cavour and Bismarck to bring about the unification of Italy and Germany. A similarity is observed when both leaders: applied the use of diplomacy and military action to attain their countries unification; Both leaders further used a political tactic known as<em> realpolitik</em> which was characterized by the employment of unethical and dishonest diplomatic means to attain unification in Italy and Germany. However, they differed on what tactic to use in their unification process. Bismark opted for direct engagement in the war while Cavour preferred diplomacy to manipulate other nations in the military activities.

7 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What issue led to the split in the democratic-republican party in the late 1850s
    15·1 answer
  • What outlined the representation that enslaved people would have in government?
    9·1 answer
  • This early civilization consisted of a o group of
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the emperor give the leader of the Minamoto family the title of shogun?
    10·1 answer
  • Which is the best definition for the term American frontier
    6·1 answer
  • Immigration can result in a general decrease in wages because immigration
    9·1 answer
  • What is Art?
    10·2 answers
  • Five Facts About the Mayans
    12·1 answer
  • Who created the proslavery lecompton constitution?.
    13·1 answer
  • What was the biggest problem for the mills
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!