1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
denpristay [2]
3 years ago
8

What part did Esther Hobart Morris play in the womans right

History
1 answer:
adoni [48]3 years ago
3 0
She made peace for the woman's rights movement 
You might be interested in
What actions did General Butler take against New Orleans schools? Check all that apply.
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer:A,B,C

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The yalta conference was held in the country of
notka56 [123]

The Yalta Conference was held in the country of Russia in the city of Yalta, hosted by the Soviet Union.

6 0
3 years ago
Have political parties contributed to divisiveness or have they kept the country intact?​ Please Exsplain.
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

They have kept the country intact

Explanation:

I think this is a very interesting question. In my opinion, I think they have kept the country intact, look at it this way. Political parties means that there exists choice for the people. Absence of political parties makes it a 1 man ruling without the necessary checks and balances. Like in that of a monarchical ruling t, or military ruling. Essentially, one can do and undo as one wishes.

Now, the advent of political parties brings choice, meaning the people can choose. In a situation where party A doesn't fulfill its political campaign promises, they are at risk of being voted out by the people for party B. Party B themselves won't sit down idle, while not in power, they wake the people up to the wrongdoings of party A.

Like I said, the presence of political parties brings choice to the people, and also creates checks and balances. So, yes, they have kept the country intact.

5 0
2 years ago
The german army suffered a severe loss against the soviets in the battle of
oksano4ka [1.4K]
Battle of Stalingrad
3 0
2 years ago
Why did the Zhou dynasty collapsed?
NNADVOKAT [17]
Hello friend...

The Zhou dynasty was pretty much non existent after the sacking of the capital by Quanrong in 771 BC since after that Zhou dynasty could no longer exert its power on its vassal states anymore. The vassal states now instead of listening to Zhou king they would listen to a Duke from a major state like Duke Huan of Qi (reign, 685 -643 BC), Duke Wen of Jin (reign, 636–628 BC), King Zhuang of Chu (reign, 613–591 BC), Duke Mu of Qin (reign, 659–621 BC). Some states outright countered the power of Zhou like Duke Zhuang of Zheng (743–701 BC) who even attacked Zhou. In Spring and Autumn period (770–475 BC) those Dukes still borrowed the name of Zhou king for their own advantage, so sometimes they paid tribute to Zhou king to borrow his approval. That was just to be nice, if Zhou king disapproved then the one who lost more was Zhou king himself since he would no longer receive any things from that major state and all other states allied to that major state. From Warring States period (475–221 BC), no one cared about what Zhou king had to say anymore and no one bothered to get his approval anymore. They just freely fought each other, conquered each other and deemed Zhou king as just lord of a minor state that they can take over anytime they wanted. Eventually, the little land of Zhou was conquered by Qin in 2 occasions: 256 BC and 249 BC.

Hence, officially, Zhou ended in 249 BC by the invasions from Qin. However, its power as a proper dynasty would have ended long before in the year of 771 BC.

And why the Zhou was attacked and lost its power in 771 BC ? That was largely due to the poor governing and poor credibility of King You of Zhou (reign 782–771 BC). He was a bad King, just like King Zhou of Shang, only into wines and girls without giving any thought on governing. In order to buy a laughter from the girl he loved, he ignited the big flames in the mountains which were used very exclusively for the cases of a serious emergency. Soldiers from vassal states were supposed to march toward the Zhou capital whenever they saw those flames, believing that the Zhou king was in danger. Thus, when they saw the king and his lover ridiculed them coming for nothing, they thought they were humilated by the king, and the king who played on the fate of his country didn’t deserve his post. Since then, the confidence that vassal states had on the king was all gone. And when Qianrung attacked the Zhou capital, no one came rescue when the flames were lit again. The king was killed in the attack, and Zhou lost its power since then. So I think the fall of Zhou was mainly due to King You of Zhou himself (due to his incompetence and moral depravity) since before him his father King Xuan of Zhou (827- 782) was a capable ruler, who brought back the stability and prosperity of Zhou.

And the further reason might be due to its problematic way of governing when at the foundation, Zhou rulers gave so much autonomy for their vassal states. Thus, when the central government became weakened and at the same time vassal states got stronger, inevitably Zhou central government can no longer hold its vassal states together. Later dynasty, Qin, Han got the lessons from Zhou and chose to build a centralized government with emperor having absolute power over any governing branches and any jurisdiction.

Hope this helps you...
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did Britain do to India
    9·2 answers
  • Which describes how Congress affects the president’s abilities to grant pardons and appoint cabinet members?
    7·1 answer
  • Nixon's plan to end the war in vietnam included doing what in south vietnam
    6·2 answers
  • The untimely death of Professor Hathaway halted his groundbreaking research into the uses of solar power. It therefore appears t
    5·1 answer
  • In the period from 1450-1750 new ideals such as individualism, freedom, and self—determination rose out of the Enlightenment. De
    13·1 answer
  • Select all the correct answers. What are two reasons that the Louislana Purchase caused a debate in the United States?
    8·1 answer
  • Which are characteristics of the Dominican Republic today? Check all that apply.
    11·1 answer
  • 1. What is the historical context of this Farewell Address?
    13·1 answer
  • Why does Massachusettensis mention the purchase of New York from the Dutch and the recent war with Canada? *
    7·1 answer
  • Describe the process of Western Europe transforming from a unified Roman Empire in 330 to independent nation-states in 1500.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!