The answer is B.
Schenk vs US involves a freedom of speech case in which Schenk encouraged American citizens to avoid the military draft during World War I.
The Supreme Court ruled this was not protected free speech because it provides a clear and present danger to American citizens. The court felt that influencing people to not join the war presented a danger to America’s war effort.
The deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially when it's from a particular ethnic group or nation.
Answer:
Main negative effect are .
The loss if job
Income inequality
Explanation:
The loss of these jobs is just the most visible tip of NAFTA's impact on the U.S. economy. In fact, NAFTA has also contributed to rising income inequality, suppressed real wages for production workers, weakened workers' collective bargaining powers and ability to organize unions, and reduced fringe benefits.
NAFTA's Impact on U.S. Workers. ... Second, NAFTA strengthened the ability of U.S. employers to force workers to accept lower wages and benefits. As soon as NAFTA became law, corporate managers began telling their workers that their companies intended to move to Mexico unless the workers lowered the cost of their labor.
The greatest explanation for the overall low MMR (Maternal Mortality Rate) of industrialized nations is that these nations have higher GDPs--meaning that more money can be spend on things like healthcare and social "safety nets" for the poor.
Answer:
White
Explanation:
i hate to say it but i believe if you were not white or had white genes then you were a slave back then
