Answer:
The Pequot War was an armed conflict that took place between 1636 and 1638 in New England between the Pequot tribe and an alliance of the colonists of the Massachusetts Bay, Plymouth, and Saybrook colonies and their allies from the Narragansett and Mohegan tribes. The war concluded with the decisive defeat of the Pequots. At the end, about 700 Pequots had been killed or taken into captivity.[1] Hundreds of prisoners were sold into slavery to the West Indies;[2] other survivors were dispersed as captives to the victorious tribes.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
he invented the lightning rod
Until 1921, the Russian economy was completely mutilated and destroyed by war communism. Socialism did not start in good light, so Lenin became worried about the overall state of the economy. the war of communism that lasted from 1918 to 1921 brought the economy to a complete collapse. In March 1921, the Kronshtadt Rebellion happened, which convinced Lenin that changes in the economy should be made. Thus, in 1922. he revised economic policy and introduced the so-called new economic policy (NEP). The peasants were allowed to sell part of their property for profit, and traders were allowed to engage in business. He was thinking that it would last for decades, but only seven years later in 1928. Lenin's successor, Stalin, centralized the economy and again nationalized a huge part of the economy.
The loyalists fought for the British but also the Iroquois Confederacy which were a tribe of Native Americans. The British promised them freedom after they won and that they would allow them to stay in their land peacefully
Answer:In the United States, the Constitution has established a system of “dual sovereignty,” under which the States have surrendered many of their powers to the Federal Government, but also retained some sovereignty. Examples of this dual sovereignty are described in the U.S. Constitution.
Explanation:The doctrine also was used as an argument for the theory known as nullification, which claimed that states had the right to annul an act of the federal government within their boundaries, and for the claim that the states, by virtue of their sovereignty, had the right to secede from the Union.
