Arguments in favour of a minimum wage mostly hang on the idea that firms have a responsibility to ensure that their workers earn enough to live on. If a firm can’t pay its workers enough to live on, then it isn’t a viable business, because it is dependent on wage subsidies. Of course “enough to live on” depends where you live: the cost of living in London is considerably higher than it is in, say, Newcastle, so a minimum wage that would give a reasonable standard of living in Newcastle is starvation level in London. The campaign for a voluntary Living Wage tries to persuade firms to pay above the current UK minimum wage, which is perceived as being below the real cost of living.
Unlike Britain, France, and Russia, the United States has never faced a full on war on its own soil (although some include the War of 1812 in this category)--due mostly to the fact that the US has been so well protected by the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
Answer:
These liberties, recognized as belonging to both adults and children, are commonly known as fundamental rights—that is to say, rights which the population is entitled to fully enjoy without government intrusion. Nevertheless, the proper exercise of these liberties, taken in conjunction with the need for public order, national security, the preservation of moral values, as well as respect for the rights of one’s fellowman—all of this necessarily entails that some restrictions be placed upon these liberties.
Explanation:
I hope this helps
Answer:
Under Umar, the Rashidun forces decisively defeat the Eastern Roman Empire, ending their rule in Syria and claiming it for the Muslims. This, along with other key victories, brings great wealth to the caliphate.
Explanation:
