A debate from the perspective of a Northerner over Missouri Statehood would be one talking about the importance of limiting slavery.
A argument from a Southerner would be one arguing that Northerners should allow slavery in states that want slavery.
<h3>What were the arguments for Missouri Statehood?</h3>
Missouri wanted to gain admission into the Union as a slave state and the North did not want this because they were against slavery spreading to other parts of the Union.
Southerners on the other hand, wanted slavery in Missouri as they believed that it would increase the power of slave states in Congress. They therefore argued that territories such as Missouri that wanted slavery, should be free to have slavery.
Find out more on Missouri Statehood at brainly.com/question/1855671.
The appropriate response is National Nominating Convention. It's the fantastic prologue to a political gathering's possibility for president. In some cases this is the point at which the bad habit presidential candidate is picked, also. A legislator may even give an energizing discourse that turns into the discussion of the nation. We'll investigate exactly how national selecting traditions function and how they've changed.
Answer:
policy of appeasement
Explanation:
throughout the 1930s Britain and france let hitler do what he wanted hoping he would stop making demands and war would not happen. This policy is known as appeasement
