1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NARA [144]
4 years ago
8

Read these lines from a novel with a first-person narrator:

English
1 answer:
deff fn [24]4 years ago
4 0
<span>What is a likely purpose of the author's use of dialect to narrate the story?
Choices:
to poke fun at the society to which the narrator belongs
to comment critically on the narrator's beliefs
to emphasize that the narrator is lazy and purposeless
to make the text consistent with the narrator's background

I think the correct answer is TO MAKE THE TEXT CONSISTENT WITH THE NARRATOR'S BACKGROUND.</span>
You might be interested in
PLS HELP/ VERY EASY/IM VERY NEED IT
alexdok [17]

Answer:

hell manage to lift 200 kg inthe nexr olymphic games

Explanation:

i dint know what the answer

3 0
3 years ago
Some people simply cannot be active listeners, no matter how hard they try. true or false
lana66690 [7]
True beacsue of distractions and adhd
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify a challenge facing students, and
yulyashka [42]

Answer:

Many students face the problem of getting bad grades, but this can be prevented by studying, making a schedule, and asking for help.  

8 0
3 years ago
Please help me with this ASAP ASAP please please help please
juin [17]
Conspiracy theories were always irrational ideas without evidence that’s what a “theory” is so if you have proof you have to have the dates, witnesses, because anyone can fake a video or picture with the help of video editing. Though many people use the term debunk to infer that they have falsified an idea, over the years, it has become less rational an endeavor. Today many debunkers are actually pseudo-skeptics. Instead of considering an idea and trying to falsify it, many debunkers just assume science is on their side and instead try to a priori dismiss the idea, and worse to discredit the person who proposes the idea. That is not rational skepticism or critical thinking. Debunking isn’t always falsification or refutation but as often as not just name-calling and denial.
Answer

Since anything can be called a conspiracy theory, and since debunking can be achieved by put-downs and shaming; any idea you don’t like, you call a conspiracy theory and its proponent a conspiracist, and then contemptuously mock the idea and the person who advocates it. Easy-peezy-debunky-sleazy.
88 views




2

Related Questions (More Answers Below)
6 0
3 years ago
Text: Diagram:
Alona [7]
Is too long I can’t even see
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does the word “amplified” mean in the following sentence? Instead of making the music quieter, the volume was amplified. A.
    8·2 answers
  • In the canterbury tales, which option best characterizes the pardon-seller?
    8·1 answer
  • How many lessons, including the segment exam, do you need to complete in unit 3
    9·2 answers
  • How do u Punctuate this sentence don't push that bu began david
    7·1 answer
  • Una Oración en ingles de todo
    8·2 answers
  • Read the following passage from A Little Maid of Old Maine, and answer the
    13·2 answers
  • Please I beg you, to not put links if you don’t know don’t do it. It’s a lot of points. Complete everything it says
    10·1 answer
  • LOOKING BACK
    7·1 answer
  • How does the poem "On Turning Ten" by Billy Collins represents the challenges of growing up?
    7·1 answer
  • I need the answers quickly
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!