The second jury evaluated the credibility of witnesses differently that the first jury. The second jury gave different weight to different parts of the evidence than the first. The arguments of the lawyers closing statements were different, perhaps inducing the second jury to view the evidence differently than the first jury did.
When one side is facing the sun, the other is facing the darkness, so, when it's Winter in the northern half, it's Summer in the southern half. Does that make sense?
1. Mount Rushmore
2. Ask a fellow walker for a bag
3. They owe their fellow citizens a fair trial by jury
4. Northeast
I'm pretty sure that it was Justinian I.
Answer:
consul?
Explanation:
not really sure but hope it helps :)