All categories

2 years ago

To test their theories, economists usually have to:____.

Business

1 answer:

Vanyuwa [196]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Confront theories predictions with evidence

Explanation:

To test economic theories, economists would observe real behavior and test it with data from the real world. Which would in turn provide evidence based on what is being tested. Confronting theories predictions with evidence is a pointer to the fact that economic theories are verifiable and their validity can be tested.

You might be interested in

Barney bought a small retail business a month ago. He plans to advertise it with the help of billboards and flyers to attract cu

disa [49]

Answer:

The answer is A. non-operating expense

Explanation:

As he operates a retail shop, such advertising is vital to attract customers to the shops and to make potential sales. We can't treat this expenses as administration or production expenses.

We consider this as non operational because advertising is not an operational part of the operations of a retail business. Moreover, we can't consider it as selling expenses because they are mostly incurred during the sales process.

6 0

2 years ago

What institution will Martha's lender check before granting or denying a loan or mortgage to Martha?

aalyn [17]

Answer:

A credit bureau

Explanation:

A credit bureau is a agency which collects the credit history of consumers so that creditors can make decisions about granting loans. So the only logical choice is for Martha's lender to check with them to get her credit history before denying or granting her a mortgage or loan.

6 0

2 years ago

Mr. Barker enjoys a comfortable retirement income. He recently had surgery and expected that he would have certain services and

olasank [31]

Answer:

What you could tell him is that you can offer to help him review all the plans appeal process as well as to help him ask the plan to review his coverage decision which will enable him to know why he had large charges in excess of his maximum out-of-pocket limit.

Explanation:

Based on the information given we were told that when he received the bill, their was large charges in excess of his maximum out-of-pocket limit which is a limit on the amount of money a person or an individual have to pay for covered medical care services in which we were still told that the large charges in excess of his maximum out-of-pocket limit also include a number of services and items he thought would be fully covered, therefore since he called you to ask what he could do, What you could tell him is that you will offer to help him review all the plans appeal process and to as well help him to ask the plan to review the coverage decision which is why coverage decision is of benefit because it enables a person or an individual to makes decision about their benefits including the amount they have to pay for their medical services plan.

6 0

3 years ago

Dreyfus points a gun at Eton, threatening to shoot him if he does not steal from his employer, Freddy’s Gas & Shop store, an

Anastasy [175]

Answer:

The answer is Duress.

Explanation:

Duress is a term in law used to justify a wrong action but excluding murder cases.

For a defendant to successfully prove he or she acted under duress, the following must be satisfied:

1. The defendant is in an immediate danger that could lead to death. For example, if Dreyfus shoots Eton by refusing, he can shoot Eton to death.

2. There is a believe that the defendant will be will be hurt

3. There is no option to avoid the harm or being hurt other than to succumb to doing the illegal action.

7 0

2 years ago

Bigham Corporation, an accrual basis calendar year taxpayer, sells its services under 12-month and 24-month contracts. The corpo

Gnesinka [82]

Answer: 2016= $13,000; 2017= $25,000

Explanation:

for 2016

Income to be recognised in 2016 for 12 months term= Total proceeds x period of service provided (july -december )/ Total contract term

Income to be recognised in 2016= 14,000 x 6months /12months

= 14,000 x 1/2= $7,000

Income to be recognised in 2016 for 24 months term= Total proceeds x period of service provided (july -december )/ Total contract term

Income to be recognised in 2016= 24,000 x 6months /24months

= 24,000 x 1/4= $6,000

income to be recognized in taxable income in 2016= $7,000 + $6,000= $13,000

for 2017

Income to be recognised in 2017 for 12 months contract term= Total proceeds x remaining period of service provided from jan. to june 2017 / Total contract term

Income to be recognised in 2017= 14,000 x 6months /12months

= 14,000 x 1/2= $7,000

Income to be recognised in 2017 for 24 months contract term= Total proceeds x remaining period of service provided fromjuly 2016 -dec 2017/ Total contract term

Income to be recognised in 2016= 24,000 x (24-6) 18months /24months

= 24,000 x 3/4= $18,000

income to be recognized in taxable income in 2017= $7,000 + $18,000= $25,000

7 0

3 years ago