I would say D as well. Animals need homes to live in... and they can't live in that area if the trees and plant life is always getting cut down.
The Boston massacre was partially the colonists fault because they were harassing the British soldiers by throwing, sticks, rocks and snowballs at them. The soldiers panicked and many accounts say that they heard someone yell fire.
Hope this helped! If you have any questions please ask!
C) The testing and retesting of ideas provides the best approach to solving problems.
The scientific method relies upon gathering of data. Creation of a hypothesis that can both predict new data and is potentially falsifiable. Gathering of new data that is predicted by the hypothesis, or indicates that the hypothesis is incorrect, in which case modify the old hypothesis, or create a new one that matches the known data. Now with that in mind, let's look at the choices and see what fits.
A) New ideas about the world must be supported by established theory. * This option assumes that established theory comprising the whole of all possible theories. This is in direct conflict with the scientific method and is therefore a bad choice.
B) Faith can be used to reconcile conflicts between observation and ideology. * The scientific method relies only on the observed data. As such, using faith to reconcile differences between observations and what one thinks things should be is in conflict. So this too, is a bad choice.
C) The testing and retesting of ideas provides the best approach to solving problems. * This is a nice truthful summary of the scientific method. So this is the correct choice.
D) Truth about the conditions of life is found in the teachings of the Church. * This is not the scientific method. So this is a bad choice.
Because of colonialism and international influences within African territory, culture has become somewhat diversified, influenced and with distant and modified concepts from the region's ancestral culture. All of this has generated such a strong cultural diversity in the environment that few things are seen and done by the ancestors of the African people. With the passage of time and American influences on the continent, African culture has become increasingly American, which makes us claim that African cultural values are only illusions.
This tends to worsen with the influence of Western countries in Africa, which causes native Africans to increasingly abandon their roots and adopt different and distant values. This is very damaging to a nation, which loses what makes it unique and special.
For this reason, it is important for African families to research and encourage the implementation of ancestral and pure African values, practices and concepts, returning to their roots and keeping their culture alive, influential and admired by themselves, their descendants and the world. Thus making the culture alive through the centuries.
How you answer that question depends much on your political point of view. A 2006 article by Ron Haskins, published by the conservative Brookings Institute, declared the 1996 welfare reforms a success. Haskins pointed to evidence such as a 60% decline in the welfare caseload by 2004 as a result of the 1996 reforms. He also pointed to studies indicating that 60 to 80% of adults leaving welfare are gainfully employed.
Meanwhile, liberal writers such as Peter Edelman and Barbara Ehrenreich, writing in the <em>Washington Post </em>(<span>December 6, 2009), have said that welfare reform failed, because the number of those living in poverty in America rose in the years following welfare reform. The lack of access to welfare contributed to that rise in poverty, they argue. It's harder for people to get cash assistance through Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (which is what welfare was renamed). But dependence on food stamps doubled in the years after Clinton left office.
So "success" or "disaster" will depend on whether viewed through a conservative or liberal lens.</span>
