The American colonists were justified in doing this simply because their colonies had become too big and too important to be treated as a colony by the British. The British should have given the colonies some autonomy, but they did not. The analogy I like to use is that of teens and their parents. Parents have to give teens more independence as they grow up. If they do not, the teens may justifiably rebel.
The British were not, on the whole, brutal or oppressive towards the colonists. However, they would not let the colonists have much in the way of self-rule. This had been fine when the colonies were still small and economically weak. By the 1760s and 1770s, however, the colonies were "teenagers." They were big and strong enough to expect some autonomy. When Britain reacted to requests for autonomy by being more strict, the colonists were justified in rebelling.
Answer: supposedly in an effort to get rich or acquire political power.
Explanation:
The term carpetbagger was used by opponents of Reconstruction—the period from 1865 to 1877 when the Southern states that seceded were reorganized as part of the Union—to describe Northerners who moved to the South after the war, supposedly in an effort to get rich or acquire political power.
your welcome...
It was for independence from the Austrian <span>Empire, ruled by the Habsburg dynasty.</span>
Answer:
B.The economy of many colonies depended on slavery
Explanation:
Without slavery the economy would have gone down
Answer:
D) It was more important to create a functioning government that the Southern States would support.
Explanation:
Please mark brainliest
