Answer:
The correct answer is It allows workers to specialize in a variety of skills
Explanation:
Job specialization (also known as division of labor) first proposed by the scottish economist Adam Smith, exposed in his main work "The Wealth of Nations" in 1776, refers to the process of breaking large jobs into smaller jobs assigned to individual workers. The purpose of job specialization is to focus each worker's concentration on a specific area of expertise within the production process. The argument states that, through the specialization and refinement of skills, productivity will increase.
Answer:
The General Assembly
It has been called the "town meeting of the world." Its specific duties include the election of the members of the Economic and Social Council, the board of the UN Industrial Development Organization, and some members of the Trusteeship Council.
You must be able to keep your audience's motivation in mind in order to persuade them into what are you saying, because keeping in mind, what the audience wants gives you an opportunity to support you on your side, winning them and making your persuasion more relevant to them, which gets them hooked.
Answer:
Anxious attachment style
Explanation:
Relations are built on giving and take perspective in society as well as in families. This is the concept of love and affection. Anxious attachment occurs when a child feels safe, secure and soothed by the parents consistently than a child creates an anxious attachment style.
When a person feels crave acceptance in relations but remains highly vigilant and sensitive to any sign of possibility with rejection is preoccupied with ambivalent attachment style.
Four cases that support affirmative action are Swann v
Charlotte-Mecklenberg County Schools, Brown v Board of Education, Grutter v
Baller, and United Steelworkers of America v Weber. Meanwhile four cases that
oppose affirmative action are Regents of the University of California v. Bakke,
Adarand Constructors v. Pena, Gutter vs. Bollinger, and Parenting involved in
community schools v Seattle school district.
