Considering there is no question i would say whatever you want it to be.
It would be very difficult to argue that one person/event can accurately summarize the huge political, social, and economic changes that took place during this era. One must consider that this time period saw the anti-war movement, civil rights movement, environmental movement, and parts of the women's rights movement. No one person or event involved all of these different changes at once.
However, if you were to make this argument you could use the following:
a) Martin Luther King Jr.- His role in the Civil Rights movement and peace movement make him one of the biggest civil rights icons of the 21st century.
b) March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom- This 1963 march included hundreds of thousands of Americans and allowed MLK to give his "I have a dream speech."
Answer:
they are more likely to see economic class as circumstantial, not a reflection of how hard one works
Explanation:
Democrats are more likely to encourage the federal government to spend money on social aid for the poor because "they are more likely to see economic class as circumstantial, not a reflection of how hard one works"
This is because the belief that hard work is not the only yardstick or reason that defines the economic class is what drives the spending on social aid for the poor. Hence, hardworking people can also be poor but needs social aid to help them out.
Blockades blocked the south from getting any supplies or weapons. They were surrounded and could not keep a fair fight. Lee knew this, thus leading to the surrender at Appomattox Courthouse.
Answer:
Explanation:
The Louisiana Purchase (1803) was a land deal between the United States and France, in which the U.S. acquired approximately 827,000 square miles of land west of the Mississippi River for $15 million.
