<span><span>Have I studied my subject with sufficient care so that I understand what qualities in it caused my initial response, and have I studied it with sufficient care so that I have deepened or otherwise changed that response? </span><span>Is the title of my essay at least moderately informative? </span><span>Is the opening paragraph interesting and, by its end, have I focused on the topic? </span><span>Do I state my main point (thesis) soon enough--perhaps even in the title--and do I keep it in view throughout my essay? </span><span>Is the organization reasonable? Does each point lead to the next without irrelevancies? </span><span>Does each paragraph revolve around a topic idea, a criterion that directly supports my thesis? </span><span>Are generalizations or assertions about personal responses supported by illustrative examples, concrete evidence, research, etc.? </span><span>Are the sentences concise, clear, and emphatic? Are needless words and inflated language eliminated? </span><span>Is the final paragraph conclusive without being repetitive? </span><span>Are the quotes and paraphrases accurate? Is credit given to sources? Are copies of relevant sources included and important passages highlighted? </span><span>Are long quotes really necessary? </span><span>Has the essay been proofread? Are spelling and punctuation correct?</span></span>
The response in the statement falls under the Gibb's communication concept of 'superiority'. In this concept type, superiority is a kind of defensive approach or behavior in communication. The sens of superiority occurs when the speaker thinks he is more accomplished in communication than the listener for whom the message is conveyed. 'I have done this a million times' in the statement reveals an air of superiority and the speaker can do it all alone, and without the help of anyone.
