1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
melomori [17]
3 years ago
15

How did the supreme court decision in worcester v. georgia and the indian removal act lead the removal and resettlement of nativ

e american groups?
Please help quickly, I am really stuck on this question. I need a simple, easy to understand answer (summary) or website that I could go off of. Thanks. xx
History
1 answer:
bixtya [17]3 years ago
7 0
For the answer to the question above, i<span>In several decisions in the latter half of the twentieth century, the Supreme Court revived Marshall's assertion that the Native American tribes possess an inherent form of national sovereignty and the right of self-determination. From that point forward the </span>Worcester<span> decision became the Indian nations' most powerful weapon against state and local encroachments on their tribal powers. I hope this helps.</span>
You might be interested in
Which of the following belongs in this list of conditions created by the Articles of Confederation to admit a territory into the
GarryVolchara [31]
<span>C. Women had the right to vote</span>
3 0
3 years ago
How did the resolution of the Korean War impact global politics, especially in the Pacific?
AlekseyPX
It gained political and security benefits. 
6 0
3 years ago
The second westward surge of settlement reached the:
joja [24]

Mississippi river would be correct answer. gl


5 0
3 years ago
What did the evergreen tree symbolize thousands of years ago
lyudmila [28]

Answer:

Evergreen trees symbolized an everlasting life with God.

Explanation:

I hope this helps!

3 0
2 years ago
Compare and Contrast Thomas Hobbes and John Locke's ideas of Social Contract
svetlana [45]

Answer:

(1) Hobbes' sovereign is not a party to any contract and has no obligation to protect his citizens' natural rights. (2) Locke has two contracts (between citizens and citizens, and between citizens and the government) in place of Hobbes' single contract (between citizens to obey the sovereign).

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Soviet Union and the United States nearly went to war with each other in 1962 when the United States discovered Soviet missi
    10·1 answer
  • Describe the significance of marbury v. madison political science
    15·1 answer
  • Which form of government structure does state government closely resemble?
    10·1 answer
  • The only country to use women as combatants in World War II was a Germany. b Britain c the Soviet Union d Japan. e Italy
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following best describes how the spread of railroads aided the U.S. economy during the 1800s?
    13·1 answer
  • Why where the clauses probably inserted reparations?
    5·1 answer
  • Who is the recipient of this letter who memorized the design of British machines
    13·1 answer
  • explain one way in which increased international trade improved the standard of living for both Americans and Europeans.
    12·1 answer
  • A <br> a result of the summer voting rights marches was that
    7·1 answer
  • In a complete sentence what were the main issues leading to the secession of Southern States from the Union?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!