The answer is the French – Indian War. It eroded the
colonies of British America against those of New France.
Both borders were supported by military units from their parent countries
of Great Britain and France,
as well as by American Indian partners. At the beginning of the war, the French
North American colonies had a populace of approximately 60,000 settlers,
compared with 2 million in the British North American colonies. The outstripped
French mainly depended on the Indians. The European nations declared war on one
another in 1756 following months of restricted conflict, escalating the war
from a regional affair into an intercontinental conflict. This battles between
France and England in the new world resulting in the loss of all French
possessions.
New Zealand and Australia as colonies were differnet from India because they C. attracted large numbers of settlers from Great Britain.
<h3>How were New Zealand and Austrailia different from India?</h3>
New Zealand and Austrialia were able to attract a lot of British people to stay in them which made them more loyal to the British.
India on the other hand, only provided resources to the British and never really saw a mass migration by British people.
Find out more on the Austrialia colony at brainly.com/question/4196080.
#SPJ1
<span>Fear that Soviet expansion threatened Japan's interests in Asia
</span>
