The answer is between B and D.
The 300 villages in the Lottery are blindly obedient to a tradition that is years and years old. Some things have been dropped and others added and nobody quite knows why.
The beginning of June 28 is just as serene. There are all sorts of interpretations, but nothing hides Jackson's anger about blind tradition that would even sacrifice young children and accept it as being a "good sport."
Tilly is the only one who is justifiably upset. The stones are going to be about her and they will kill her. Being stoned in the Bible was a slow painful process. You weren't killed by being hit. You died by suffocation because the weight of the stones eventually was greater than what the lungs could push up and let down so you could continue breathing.
This stoning is less biological and more what you think stoning should accomplish -- death by loss of blood. It is a horrible death. Everyone seems to take it for granted -- everyone but Tilly who had to endure it.
If you were writing an essay, you could easily defend A, B and D. My choice is D, but I wouldn't discount B at all.
I would go with:
Refers to an argument based on false or exaggerated information about the losing argument
We can actually deduce here that the reason Hellen Keller's father to write the Perkins institution was because of the condition of Hellen Keller. She was blind.
<h3>Who is Hellen Keller?</h3>
Hellen Keller was actually known to be a young girl was deaf and blind. It was at nineteenth months old that her parents discovered that she was deaf and blind. Bell had to meet with Keller's parents and suggested that they contact the Perkins Institute for the Blind in Boston, Massachusetts.
Her parents then wrote to the Perkins School for the Blind. She later attended the Perkins School for the Blind. It was in this school that Keller learnt how read and how to speak. She made up her mind to learn. Hellen Keller learnt many languages including French, Latin, Greek and German.
Learn more about Hellen Keller on brainly.com/question/19079087
#SPJ1
Answer:
But indicates a cause /effect relationship.
Answer:
I changed around some syntax in your reasons to make them stronger.
Intro:
Hook [eSports is becoming increasingly prominent in pop culture]. Thesis [therefore, eSports should be considered a school sport]. Reasons [cognitive: Problem solving & strategy skill development. Social Development. Entertainment and art.]
BP1: reason 1 [Cognitive: Problem solving & strategy skill development]. explain [it is important to develop these skills because...]
BP2: reason 2 [Social Development]. explain [it helps students develop socially by..... and it is important to develop socially because....]
BP3: reason 3 [entertainment and art]. explain [these are important because....]
BP4: counterargument [some people think eSports should not be a school sport because ______. But their reasoning is weak because _____]
Conclusion: restate reasons, then thesis, but phrase things differently than you already did to keep things interesting.
