It is from my experience since if it is from his experience then the author could tell us something like it is a beautiful place or it is very warm. based on these statements it is opinions since he doesn't have a fact do back it up. his experience tells us what he thought so it is his opinion
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
Given that,
Net income = 50,000
Preferred dividend = 2,000
Outstanding common stock:
= (40,000 × 2) + (10,000 × 6/12 × 2)
= 80,000 + 10,000
= 90,000
2016 basic earnings per share:
= (Net income - Preferred dividend) ÷ Outstanding common stock
= (50,000 - 2,000) ÷ 90,000
= 48,000 ÷ 90,000
= $0.53 per share
Therefore, the 2016 basic earnings per share is $0.53.
Answer:
a.) Nukere should be held liable because of the dangerous nature of hazardous waste. Regardless of safety checks, the accident happened.
Explanation:
"Nuclear power plants" are known to be<em> the most reliable source of electricity</em> there is in the world. However, they pose some<em> risks</em> especially when it comes to the possibility of a nuclear accident happening.
When it comes to "nuclear third party liability," a strict liability of the nuclear operator means that the victim has no fault in any situation that might occur. This means that <em>the operator is responsible or liable</em> of the power plant's dangerous nature of hazardous wastes.
Whether or not they have recently passed safety checks, there is no need for them to prove anything on he is at fault. So, <u>this makes Nukere liable for the situation.</u>
This explains the answer.
6 Months can be a life insurance policy normally be backdated from the date of the application.
For Example:- Suppose, he/she purchased a policy with maturity duration of 20 years in March 2022 and backdated it to October 2021, the maturity benefits of the endowment policy can be reaped a year before in October 2041 than the initial date in March 2042.
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Group polarization is a concept in social psychology where the decision made by a group of people is more extreme to the decision made by the individual members of the group.
The members of the group recommended 3,5,7 years as prison sentence individually but 10 years together. 10 years is more extreme when compared to the sentences recommended individually.
I hope my answer helps you.
