1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Maurinko [17]
3 years ago
6

The leaders of the United States, the USSR, and Great Britain said they wanted to cooperate, so why were negotiations at the Yal

ta and Potsdam conferences so difficult?
History
1 answer:
PIT_PIT [208]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:  Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.

Context/explanation:

Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests.   So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.

While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them.   As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime."  Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion.  Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR.  That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death.  Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.

Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism.  Again as noted by The Churchill Project:  "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire."  As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.

You might be interested in
One example of a civic responibility that is not a requirment is
Whitepunk [10]

-Voting

-Running for office

-Taking place in civic meetings


Take your pick

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which activities did soldiers carry out as part of heir routine during he civil war?
scoundrel [369]
Care for their horses.  Clean there guns.  Sending and receive letters.  Pratice drilling orders.   


Some soldiers did what soldiers do, burn stuff to the ground, buy some time from a women, gamble....  
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following was one reason that World War II alliances broke down following the end of the conflict
ZanzabumX [31]
Your answer should be C.) Stalin broke promises to allow free elections in Eastern Europe

Stalin made it clear that after the war, he wanted Polish land. The other allies were not for this, but knew that they could not stop him. The only restriction they made him agree to was to let them hold free elections. While Stalin agreed, he did no end up keeping this promise. Thus, the tensions between the Soviet Union and America began.

Hope this helps!
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can he then be trusted with the government of others? Or have
tankabanditka [31]

Answer:

C.Jefferson's questions undermine the divine rule of kings, in keeping with

Enlightenment principles that argue governmental authority should be

derived from the natural rights of man.

Explanation:

This philosophical question was made by Thomas Jefferson during his First Inaugural Speech as the President of the United States of America in 1801.

Before he asked the question, he talked about some people that may not believe in the form of government the United States is using.

He described it as ". I believe this, on the contrary, the strongest government on earth. I believe it the only one, where every man, at the call of the law, would fly to the standard of the law and would meet invasions of the public order as his own personal concern."

This, therefore, made his question that followed the statement above to undermine the divine rule of kings, in keeping with Enlightenment principles that argue governmental authority should be derived from the natural rights of man.

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT
Flura [38]

Answer:

shipping was very expensive and business owners started to get upset with the cost.

Explanation:

this is because in 1800s the business owners had their own transport even rail ways

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Erin works for a dry-cleaning company that has a contract with the U.S. government. To save on cleaning fluid, her boss orders h
    11·1 answer
  • Goods carried out by peddlers to outlying areas?
    7·2 answers
  • What programs did we see under the new deal 1920
    6·1 answer
  • Which situation contributed to the economic problems of the late 1920s?
    14·1 answer
  • Most of the state constitution of 1910 remains in effect today
    11·1 answer
  • Which quote best represents a person performing a cost-benefit analysis?
    13·1 answer
  • When did Gandhi die?
    6·2 answers
  • who leads the House of Representatives, and how is this role different from that of the leader of the Senate?
    6·1 answer
  • Helpppp this one tooo I’m doing a test
    5·2 answers
  • What was the impact of Judeo-Christian ideals on medieval culture?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!