Answer:
A. Applying a month before the deadline
Answer:
In its purest form, a market economy answers the three economic questions by allocating resources and goods through markets, where prices are generated. In its purest form, a command economy answers the three economic questions by making allocation decisions centrally by the government. so the answer is A
The best way to respond to this prompt is to:
- Consider the adverse effects of taking the phones of new students in a new environment.
- Explore further how this rule would make the students uncomfortable.
- Explain why the school authorities believe this is an effective method to encourage integration.
- Give statistical data on how this method has helped to integrate students faster in other schools.
- Make a final stand on whether you are in support or against this rule by the school authorities.
<h3>What is an Essay?</h3>
This refers to a type of writing that has a particular goal in mind and wants to convince readers about a particular viewpoint.
In this case, we can see that the cell phones of incoming students and kept away for 48 hours and a complete evaluation of this rule is needed and the above guideline would help you accomplish your goal.
Read more about argumentative essays here:
brainly.com/question/11237248
Answer:
Two similarities in how India and Vietnam gained their independence during the 20th century were that in both cases, a charismatic leader marshaled nationalist sentiment in the push to escape a European colonial overlord, and in both cases the triggering event toward independence can be traced to the empire-shattering effects of World War II. A major difference in these movements, however, is that India negotiated its independence from the British while Vietnam was forced to undertake armed struggle against the French.
Answer:
E. After “robots”
Explanation:
Answer E
Correct. The underlined text is a modifying phrase that describes the word “robots.” By placing the phrase directly after the word it modifies, the writer can reduce ambiguity in the sentence. This choice makes it clear that the modifying phrase refers to robots, not people.
