Answer:
The needed help you need is right here: The author’s purpose for writing "Banksy and the Tradition of Destroying Art” is to inform readers how Banksy’s actions are similar to actions of other artists in history. Also, the author wants to inform readers about how, despite efforts to destroy art to show that some art should not have more value than other art, artists have actually increased the value of their art. This is because the destructive actions make collectors and the elite just compete more to acquire the desired pieces of art. Describing examples in art history and explaining the cause-effect relationship between the artists and the market supports the author’s purpose.
Explanation:
This is because The author’s purpose for writing "Banksy and the Tradition of Destroying Art” is to inform readers how Banksy’s actions are similar to actions of other artists in history. Also, the author wants to inform readers about how, despite efforts to destroy art to show that some art should not have more value than other art, artists have actually increased the value of their art. This is because the destructive actions make collectors and the elite just compete more to acquire the desired pieces of art. Describing examples in art history and explaining the cause-effect relationship between the artists and the market supports the author’s purpose.
The stylistic element used in the passage is incongruity. It is a form of satire or humor. Incongruity is used in an unsuitable time. For example, If a man were in a court room and belched loudly while receiving his sentence, that would be a use of incongruity. Another example would be if at a royal wedding the groom's pants fell down in the middle of the ceremony.
<span>Either Richard or Luke has already bought HIMSELF a new jacket this fall.</span>
The answer is A because theres nothing else to modify.
