Based on historical records, it is <u>true</u> that the Confederate government passed legislation allowing individuals who owned twenty or more slaves to be exempt from the draft.
This legislation is often referred to as the Twenty-Slave Law.
The Confederates congress passed the Twenty-Slave Law in October 1862. It gave exemption to military drafting for the owners of twenty or more slaves.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>True</u>."
Learn more about the Confederate Military here: brainly.com/question/25088286
Answer:
Natural rights and popular sovereignty
Explanation:
In relation to democracy, natural rights are each individual person's right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (if based on Thomas Jefferson's ideals, life liberty and property if based on John Locke's ideals) which are pretty important as they give each person their indivudual freedoms. Poplar sovereugnty basically means that elected representatives get their power from the consent of the people, which most modern day democracys rely on to stay functioning effectively.
Homogeneous products leave consumers with no choice. Is false. Trust me. Hope I helped.
Answer: Appeasement was the right policy for England because it gave them time to prepare and get there army together. Appeasement allowed them to have peace and no conflict for a while which is a good outcome of appeasement. Lord Halifax even promoted appeasement because it allowed them to prepare for the war which happened within a year.
Explanation: It's understandable that having peace through appeasement would put England in advantage during the war and France could focus on theirselves.
I'm actually ending this unit of Napoleon in class tomorrow.
Basically Napoleon was a dictator of France who loved to carry out conquests. During the beginning of his reign he had man victories, heck in the battle of Austerlitz he was able to beat an even large Austrian and Russian army with only the french army. I'm not sure how many people were in the armies. This battle ended in a peace treaty by Austria, Treaty of Pressburg. So you can say that the Europeans thought of him as a god, for the first handful of battles. However later on he was just a shell of his glorious past. He became too selfish and ignorant in his victories, and pursued to fight England and Prussia, at the battle of waterloo. Two of the major citis that posed a threat to his conquests.
To answer your question, Europeans would have though of him differently during his first years of his ruling, and his last years of his ruling because of the victories and losses he had in battles to try to take over all of Europe. He was a crazy dictator.
