1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
givi [52]
3 years ago
6

Why did North Carolina and Rhode Island not ratify the Constitution at first?

English
1 answer:
Lapatulllka [165]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Their votes were enough to put the Constitution into effect. Two states, however, refused to sign it– North Carolina and Rhode Island. They wanted people's rights spelled out so the government could never take them away. That's why they created they didn't ratify the Constitution at first. :)

You might be interested in
Which format does not indent any section of a business letter
mel-nik [20]
Usually in business letters, italic formatting will not be used to indent any section, since italics are almost always reserved for emphasizing certain parts of the document. 
5 0
2 years ago
What argument is Susan B. Anthony making in the passage?
iVinArrow [24]

Answer:

A: Male citizens created the laws to secure the rights of men,so legal reform is required to secure women's rights.

Explanation:

Hopefully this helps!

5 0
2 years ago
Explain why the sudden and powerful dust-storm witnessed by the guards enforcing Creon’s decree about Polynices’ corpse might no
Marat540 [252]

Answer:

Because the gods wanted Antigone to complete the ritual, and so they gave here wind. Remember that this is told through the fates, so the gods must have had something to do with it. And through that, Creon´s decree was unjust so they had to do it.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to the narrator, who has arrived at the inn? Pause line 27. The canterbury tales.
natima [27]

According to the narrator - Geoffrey Chaucer-   A GROUP OF PILGRIMS, "sundry folk" arrived at the inn.

Each pilgrim is described in the Prologue of the book. ( A pilgrim is a traveler sho is on a journey to a holy place. In this case, to Canterbury, where the shrine of Thomas Beckett is).

Chaucer describes their condition, their social decree and their array. Among the pilgrims there are a knight, a squire, a cook, a carpenter, a doctor of physic, a wife of Bath, etc.

At the end of the Prologue, the host proposes a story telling contest: each pilgrim will have to tell 2 stories on the way to Canterbury and two on the way back.

That's why the title of the book is the "Canterbury Tales"

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Should college athletes get paid? Give 8 reasons why college athletes should or should not get paid.
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

Reasons, why college athletes should get paid, are:

1. College athletics generates billions in revenue and none goes to the revenue-generators.

2. Colleges shouldn’t be a free minor league for pro sports.

3. Being a college athlete is a 40-plus hour a week commitment

4. NCAA corporate offices shouldn’t look like something from a Trump resort.

5. The term “student-athlete” is a farce when you’re pulled from classes to play your sport.

6. Athletes have their social media monitored for no good reason.

7. 25 college football teams profited more than $30 million.

8. Coaches' salaries are closing in on eight-figures.

9. Coaches can leave without penalty, but players have to sit out a year when transferring.

Reasons why school athletes should not be paid includes:

1. Who's going to pay for it all?

I'm no economist, but it's pretty much common sense that if college athletes get paid, costs will go up.

Football players will be paid the most obviously because of popularity. The question then would be, how

much? If you're a college student going to a major university and you're not an athlete, odds are tuition is

going to go through the roof.

2. Others don't get paid as well

This goes back to No. 6, regarding the college process.

Plenty of college students nationwide are not paid for their contribution everyday. The biggest example being

internships. Many others must first start off as a non-paid employee to jump start their career. Why should we

make exceptions for athletes?

3. Which athletes get paid?

This is easily the biggest dilemma of all and would bring many college protests.

If the football team gets paid, why not the tennis team or the volleyball team? They're athletes too, right? What

about the golf players? They're all there on athletic scholarship. How about the chess team, as well? And

who could forget about the rowing team? And female athletes?

It would never end because you've opened Pandora's box. Once you pay one athletic program, you would

have to pay every program.

4. They already get paid

Major colleges provide the best services to their "student athletes."

5. Sends a bad message

Is this what we want elementary and middle school students to see? As soon as they see this they will be

demanding pay at the high-school level. The message College Sports would be sending is "it's ok to hold out

for more money and it's ok to only pay some athletes but not others." Every kid will grow up wanting to join the

football team just regardless of talent.

6. Recruiting won't exist

If college football (legally) paid their athletes it wouldn't last.

The recruiting process would be no more. It would result in one dominant conference for each sport and about

two handfuls of dominant teams. The smaller schools in smaller markets would not be able to compete with

the big universities resulting in loss of programs for many schools.

7. What level or division does it end?

Most "pay college athletes" groups favor paying Division one athletes.

Why not pay division two and three athletes? Do female athletes get paid as well? How about community

college athletes? You can't pay some, but not all... that would be hypocritical. All of those groups generate

revenue.

8. It's not what college is about

College is a provided service by each state. College athletes are not professionals and therefore should not

be paid. The purpose of going to college is to get the training so you can use it later. That's what the NCAA

provides. Athletes play at the college level and they further use that experience at the professional level

where they will be paid. Just like everybody else.

9. What about High School athletes?

"College athletes should be paid because they generate money for their schools."

That's the argument we hear constantly, and if that's the case high school athletes should be paid. Let me just

say now and clarify, I don't believe high school athletes should be paid. I say that even though it is true that

thousands of high schools depend on the athletic program to keep afloat.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does Ariel do for Prospero before he wakes the group from their charmed trance?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the value of college education in today sociaty
    12·1 answer
  • Please helpppp !!!!!!
    13·2 answers
  • Keeping wild animals for pets is against the law in most states
    11·2 answers
  • 16. Supporting details can do all of the following except
    8·2 answers
  • Help (as quick as possible) <br> Look at pic for questions <br><br> (for the Holocaust)
    11·1 answer
  • Help plz<br><br> =================
    11·1 answer
  • Read the poem. I Dwell In Possibility by Emily Dickinson I dwell in Possibility – A fairer House than Prose – More numerous of W
    10·1 answer
  • Complete the sentences in this paragraph.Chaucer uses specific details to describe individual characters in the "General Prologu
    12·1 answer
  • in the killer angels who says "i knew…well, you looked in the eye and there was a man. there was the divine spark…"
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!