1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mashcka [7]
2 years ago
11

What is the difference between monitoring the government and influencing the government

History
1 answer:
sp2606 [1]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Explanation:I’d say the difference between monitoring the government versus influencing the government is , first when you monitor something you just watch and make sure things don’t go wrong but when you influence something your actions cause a change and an inspiration to something

I hope this helps

You might be interested in
How does the amendment process illustrate federalism and popular sovereignty?
Goryan [66]
The people have the ability to change something about the constitution that they don’t agree with, showing popular sovereignty
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Irony means :<br>A)Tunnel vision<br>B)Probable cause<br>C)Caustic remark <br>D)Clean slate​
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer:

C. Caustic Remark

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pagsasanay:
dlinn [17]
This is another language not history , if it was history I bet u I will ace
5 0
3 years ago
What issue was addressed by the three-fifths compromise?A) How the slave population would be counted.B) How to regulate trade wi
DaniilM [7]

Your answer would be A) How the slave population would be counted. During the time, there was a big debate on whether or not the slaves in the U.S should be counted towards the whole population of the United States when it comes to voting. People wanted a proper number, or representation, of the amount of people in the U.S that voted. The free men that lived in the U.S has every right to vote, but whenever a Slave votes, their votes would count as only 3/5 of a person. That's where the three-fifths compromise comes from, it decided that slaves could only be 3/5 of a person, meaning that their vote will count as 3/5, but not 1 whole. This means that the slaves who vote don't represent a whole person, and is only partially voting. This made the voting numbers very difficult and inaccurate because a person who's voting can't be only 3/5 of a person. In order for the votes to be more accurate, people believed that everyone, even slaves, should be one whole vote, not 3/5 of a vote.

3 0
3 years ago
President lincoln thought his speech was a failure is it a myth
Crazy boy [7]
It is true that President Lincoln thought his speech was a failure. 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did South Carolina respond to the attempt by Britain to gain more control over its colonies?
    8·1 answer
  • The Qin Dynasty is known for all of the following except iron-forging common money, and laws fishing reel terracotta army
    6·2 answers
  • The migration from Siberia to North America might not have been made over an ice/land bridge. What is the name of the theory tha
    8·1 answer
  • Corn (maize) was first domesticated in Northern Argentina A the Tibetan plateau B the Canadian prairie C Central Mexico D Centra
    13·1 answer
  • The English Bill of Rights was to English citizens as the _____ was to the Puritans.
    8·1 answer
  • HELP WILL MARK BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT
    5·2 answers
  • How does a state get the number of electoral votes?
    13·2 answers
  • Can someone help me with this please and thank you &lt;3
    7·1 answer
  • How did geography influence the differences among native americans way of life
    9·1 answer
  • , do you think the United States should have been involved in the Vietnam War? Yes one or no explain
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!