You probably want to focus on major points which would be the plot and what happens during it and touch up on minor topics in the story. Like secondary Characters and small details, you would need to be very critical and stern since it is a critique. Major focus points would be the basis of the critique while minor points can help to serve as supporting evidence.
Answer: a
Explanation: because it has nothing to do with the hull house
Answer:
C
Explanation:
It leads up (rises) to the ending of the story
We can actually deduce the following from the given questions.
- Mr. Ampil's company isn't at fault since Dr. Petrovski didn't avail himself to the authorised official tour operators for sightseeing.
- The congress organizers are actually responsible for the planning and organization of the event and also to ensure that foreign delegates have a memorable experience.
- I don't think Dr. Petrovski can actually demand payment from the conference organizers because he was at fault.
- Such incidence can be prevented by the congress organizers by ensuring that every participant is checked before tour begins.
- One of the safeguards the organizers can put in place is to state their terms and conditions clearly to all participants.
<h3>Who is a conference participant?</h3>
A conference participant is actually known to be someone or an individual who attends scheduled conference which is either self-sponsored or sponsored by the organisation related to the participant.
We see that the above questions have been given the various answers.
Learn more about business conference on brainly.com/question/27206976
#SPJ1
Answer:
you could try and put yourself in da cheracter shoes U3U
Explanation:
hope dis helped
