<span>Most people were poor, and did either farming, fishing or making things. The richest people in an Indus city were probably people who owned a lot of land, or traders who controlled the buying and selling of luxury goods, such as rugs, jewels, minerals and metals. Rich traders loaded their goods on ships sailing off across the sea. They wore fine clothes, and lived in big houses with servants and perhaps slaves. Indus people did not use money. It's likely that wealth was measured by how much land a person had or how many cattle, or how many sacks of grain.</span>
It is communism because everyone must share resources equally
All of the above. The enclosure acts were a movement by the British government that closed off the commons (communal farming area for a whole village) so that only people who could afford to buy the land could use it. Many farmers at the time relied on the commons as their primary source of food and income and were forced to move to cities like Manchester or London to find work (usually with poor wages inside factories)
Answer:
Rhetoric ; conviction
Explanation:
They were best known for teaching rhetoric, which is the art of public speaking and conviction.
Answer:
Find the explanation below.
Explanation:
1. The central idea of this document is that the Mexican war was not justified. This can be seen in the last sentence by the speaker, "if I were to do to the Mexicans as I would have them do to me, I should let them alone". The young soldier in this text apparently battles with his conscience because of the people he had to kill during the war.
2. No, the United States was not justified in going to war with Mexico. In this passage the soldier seems unsettled with the idea of going to war. He does not find the idea reconcilable with what he read in the scriptures. He questioned the person that sent him to war and even mentioned that if the golden rule was to be followed, he had no business killing the Mexicans.