The most likely reason mexican citizens had conflicting views of porfirio Diaz’s rule is because He limited citizens' freedoms but he increased foreign investments and improved infrastructure. This is further explained below.
<h3>What is Diaz’s rule?</h3>
Generally, During the president of Porfirio Daz (1876–80; 1884–1911), Mexico witnessed considerable development but political rights were constrained and the free press was muzzled. This era is known as the Porfiriato.
In conclusion, The fact that Porfirio Diaz restricted citizens' freedoms while boosting foreign investment and improving infrastructure is the most likely source of the mixed opinions that Mexicans held of his leadership.
Read more about Diaz’s rule
brainly.com/question/774392
#SPJ1
Economic distress and resentment of the treaty within Germany helped fuel the ultra-nationalist sentiment that led to the rise of Adolf Hitler and his Nazi Party, as well as the coming of a second World War just two decades later.
The Three-Fifths Clause was one of the many compromises delegates worked out during the Constitutional Convention in 1787. It struck a balance between large slave states in the South and smaller northern states that had abolished slavery. It restricted, but not eliminated, the apportioned congressional representation of slave states by limiting the Census to counting slaves as only three-fifths of a person
