President Jackson was strongly against the Second Bank of the US, because of that he vetoed it.
He vetoed it because he saw the Bank as a bank only for the privileged ones, as the President saw himself as a spokesman for the common people against the elite.
The President saw this as a way to increase his popularity among his voters.
Yes the founding fathers were justified in rebelling against the British government.
The justification for their declaration comes from the series of things that they suffered from the hands of the British people.
They were subjected to paying too much taxes in the colonies.
They had no representatives in the parliament
They had a lot of trade restrictions too in the area
Rebelling against the British was a way of seeking their freedom from the oppressions that they faced. The declaration of Independence clearly gave reasons for their actions.
Answer:
The Constitution nowhere contains an express injunction to preserve the boundaries of the three broad powers it grants, nor does it expressly enjoin maintenance of a system of checks and balances. Yet, it does grant to three separate branches the powers to legislate, to execute, and to adjudicate, and it provides throughout the document the means by which each of the branches could resist the blandishments and incursions of the others. The Framers drew up our basic charter against a background rich in the theorizing of scholars and statesmen regarding the proper ordering in a system of government of conferring sufficient power to govern while withholding the ability to abridge the liberties of the governed.1
The Theory
If your thinking of Oliver Twist he asked for more?
The Constitution gives the House of Representatives the sole power to impeach an official, and it makes the Senate the sole court for impeachment trials. The power of impeachment is limited to removal from office but also provides a means by which a removed officer may be disqualified from holding future office.
