Answer:
Occupy movement could be explained through Durkheimn's Functionalism theory and Karl Marx's Conflict theory.
Studying collective behavior it could be stated that there is a collective conscience that condemns and punishes Occupy's actions and behaviors. Due to they could be considered deviant or criminal, offending this collective conscience, Durkheim would consider the Occupy movement as a "social fact". The movement would support Durkheim's theory as a social force because it is external to the individual.
This collective conscience can evolve to organic solidarity, and in the long run, there could be anomie, while the whole society no longer supports a collective consciousness in favor of what Wall Street stands for.
This change in collective conscience could be reflected in education, due to there would not be a single and unique collective conscience taught to all the students. This organic process derived from the division of labor is also shown on a full-range diversity of interests and, therefore, of interdependent students alienated from each other with singular perspectives about the Occupy movement.
Marx would support the last phenomenon as an example of a society splitting up into hostile classes facing each other. Alienation could be referred to as several students isolated from their society and competing among themselves. Another result of alienation is false consciousness, where beliefs, ideals or ideologies are not in the person's own best interest. These beliefs, ideas or ideologies are also present in an educational proposal that may not fit the individual's interests.
<em><u>The people opposed to a bill of rights didn't like the idea of putting limits on powers the government didn't even have. They feared future leaders could twist that around and use it against the people. The terms of the Constitution said that it would become effective after just nine states ratified it.</u></em>
What would Piaget say most likely in this behavior is that the behavior that the child is showing means that it has the signs of means-end behavior and emerging object permanence. It is because in means end behavior, is a way of doing or showing a specific behavior in which could be expected or unexpected in which they carry out to achieve something they want or their goal. While the emerging object permanence is a way of having a belief that inanimate objects does exist. It could be seen above as the child continues the behavior because of his belief that the food will reappear, in the same time, he has the belief that the food will be produced because he thinks that it would exist with just the push of the button.
He was responsible for proposing the three laws of motions
Answer:
The results of studies showing that cats improve the health of their owners.
