Answer:
That both runners were clueless
Explanation:
Explanation:
The Policy Process. The policy process is normally conceptualized as sequential parts or stages. These are (1) problem emergence, (2) agenda setting, (3) consideration of policy options, (3) decision-making, (5) implementation, and (6) evaluation (Jordan and Adelle, 2012).
Answer: To save her life, i would, but i find that having friends has no impact on who you are and what you want. feeling alone can be a burden, i don't find it right that she would end her life this way, it would be her choice, however if i know i am able to prevent her self inflicted death then my morals would drive me to befriend.
Answer:
court decision: Ruled that segregation violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
Legal precedent.: Overturned "separate but equal" as a legal practice.
Social impact: Gave force to the growing civil rights movement
Explanation:
In Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954), the Supreme Court ruled that racial segregation in public schools infringed the Fourteenth Amendment. By doing so, it overruled the Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) decision that claimed racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine was constitutional.
By establishing a precedent about “separate-but-equal” education, as well as any other segregating practices, as not equal at all, Brown v. Board of Education became one of the pillars of the civil rights movement.
People often look at attorney-client privilege in the criminal arena and presume that, because it could allow a guilty criminal to go free, then it doesn't make any sense. Honestly, however, that's a very small percentage of situations wherein the privilege is ever even used. First, over 90% of criminal matters are settled with a plea bargain -- so there's only 10% of any criminal matter in which the privilege could even affect the outcome. Of that 10%, most attorneys who defend criminals don't want to know whether their client is guilty or innocent, they just want the defendant to tell them their story as they see it happened. On the very rare occurrence when an admission happens, the lawyers hands become tied in several important ways -- not the least of which (at least in WA state) is that they cannot suborn perjury and if they know their client has lied on the stand, they must request that the court relieve them of continuing to represent the client.
