<em>Twenty Four Christmas trees</em> can be seen on the <em>White House</em> public tour route in 2013.
Over 450 repurposed books were used as part of the holiday as part of the holiday decorations in 2013 during <em>Christmas</em> time.
Explanation:
Is this a code to a quiz???
<u>Scientists</u><u>' argument over the relative importance of heredity and environmental influences is called the</u><u> nature-nurture debate.</u>
What does nurture refer to in the nature vs nurture debate?
- Reviewed by Psychology Today Staff. The expression “nature vs. nurture” describes the question of how much a person's characteristics are formed by either “nature” or “nurture.”
- “Nature” means innate biological factors (namely genetics), while “nurture” can refer to upbringing or life experience more generally.
What does nurture refer to?
Nurture refers to all the environmental variables that impact who we are, including our early childhood experiences, how we were raised, our social relationships, and our surrounding culture.
Who said nature vs. nurture?
The phrase 'nature versus nurture' was first coined in the mid-1800s by the English Victorian polymath Francis Galton in discussion about the influence of heredity and environment on social advancement.
Learn more about nurture
brainly.com/question/11333427
#SPJ4
Answer: Umm... I'm not too sure if this is a news article, but I think this might be able to help... Its from AJPH and their article is called, "Positive and Negative Influences of Religion, Culture, and Tradition in Public Health". It was published in March of 2019. All rights and everything go to them. I hope this helps.
"I would give him a score of about 5 out of 10, which was a vast improvement over John Q. Adams and his cronies. If you were a poor, white male, he was your guy. He greatly democratized the process of elections in that era and was our first grassroots president. However, Jackson usually did what Jackson wanted to do, even if it meant alienating many of the people who got him elected. He did not side with Southerners during the nullification crisis and was prepared to use troops against South Carolina to enforce a law that most Southerners hated. He blatantly ignored John Marshall’s decision in Worcester v. Georgia, but an argument could be made here that he was acting in favor of democracy in this case, as most white Southerners probably wanted the Cherokee moved off of their land. He was a very complex and fascinating guy, but his critics called him King Andrew for a reason." -Robert Marshall
