Well, Britain made everybody be the same religion as the king or queen, so we had no freedom of religion. We felt very restricted. They imposed too many taxes since they were in debt after the French and Indian War, like the Stamp act and Tea Act. And also, Britain required its residents to house British troops and their supplies, which was totally rude. Overall, Britain impacted the colonies negatively. Hope this helps (:
<span> the people wanted their </span>sins<span> to be forgiven, to go to heaven or to take back goods from the </span>Holy<span> Lands or because they had </span>committed<span> a crime and were forced by the church to go on a Crusade. And some people just went on Crusades for fun. Taking back Jerusalem was the main reason why Crusades occurred.</span>
The Townshend Acts, a series of acts passed, beginning in 1767 were the acts that eventually led to the Boston Massacre. Anger over the Townshend Acts led to the occupation of Boston by British troops in 1768, which eventually resulted in the Boston Massacre of 1770.
Yes, as this would ensure more equal representation for the US's states and all territories which is occupied without much care. These territories would be able to become involved, allowing the people more freedom and more power, creating a better living situation for themselves and therefore bettering the US as a whole by creating a new area of opportunity.
Leading organazation lobbying for prohibition in the usa