Answer: The balance of slave states and free states was kept equal.
Details: The Missouri Compromise (1820) admitted Missouri into the Union as a slave state with Maine being added as a free state at the same time, to keep the balance of slave and free states equal. It also prohibited any future slave states north of the latitude line 36 1/2 degrees north of the equator in territories of the Louisiana Purchase, with the exception of Missouri (north of that line) being admitted as a slave state.
Answer:
The European presence in America spurred countless changes in the environment, negatively affecting native animals as well as people. ... With their loss came the loss of beaver ponds, which had served as habitats for fish as well as water sources for deer, moose, and other animals.
Explanation:
Answer:
can I get a pic of it plz it would help
C I think that's the answer
Answer:
How many people died as a result of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? There is one thing that everyone who has tackled this question has agreed upon: The answer is probably fundamentally unknowable. The indiscriminate damage inflicted upon the cities, coupled with the existing disruptions of the wartime Japanese home front, means that any precise reckoning is never going to be achieved.
But beginning in 1945, people have tried to estimate the number of the dead and injured. The casualties from the first atomic bombings are not of mere historical interest. They are part of how we understand the effects of nuclear weapons today — for Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thankfully, remain the only instances of these weapons being used in warfare, and thus provide an invaluable “data set” upon which to base other understandings and simulations. The estimated casualties also play a nuanced role in the various narratives and arguments about the end of World War II.
How many died?
The most credible estimates cluster around a “low” of 110,000 mortalities and a “high” of 210,000, an enormous gap. (The estimates for each city have a range of ±10,000.)
There is no evidence that either of these estimates was made inaccurately or dishonestly, but they come from different sources and eras.
70.000 at Hiroshima ± <u>40.000</u><u> </u>at Nagasaki
Explanation:
I hope this helps!
No Copy Paste